Kevin Costner is in the middle of a legal conflict and decided to ask for help in Justice.
There is no doubt, Kevin Costner is one of the great leading men of Hollywood. It could be said that perhaps his golden age has already passed, and it was in the 80s and 90s, but those hearts that he conquered in those years are still yearning for him.
That is why currently, the actor is experiencing real drama with who he was his wife for almost two decades, which is something that bothers his fans a lot. But to get into context, we have to talk about the year 2000 when the movie star met the designer Christine Baumgartner and fell madly in love with her.
Kevin Costner and Christine Baumgartner began a relationship that grew by leaps and bounds. In 2004, the couple got married,, and little by little they were building a family, which was settled with three children together.
Shortly after celebrating twenty years of marriage and more than two decades together, the designer asked the Hollywood heartthrob for divorce on May 1st. Everything would have ended very well, but in the middle, a real sc@ndal broke out when she decided not to leave the house that she shared with him.
The reason why Christine Baumgartner should be the one to vacate the property is because they have a signed prenup that says so. It is for this reason that Kevin Costner appeared in court with the corresponding documents to request that his ex-wife be forcibly removed from his house.
As a result of this sc@ndal, it was learned that the woman had 30 days to leave the property and find another place to live, a period that she had already expired a few weeks ago.
Kevin Costner also revealed that he tried to help Christine Baumgartner find another home and even offered her financial help to cover her expenses. But she has always refused.
The actor's lawyer spoke about it and told a little more about the situation: “Kevin has acted in good faith and has done everything in his power to make the transition as smooth as possible. However, Christine persists in her refusal to vacate the residence that belongs solely to her, which she had committed to doing in 2004 as a stipulation of their marriage."
"Ensuring his ability to occupy his separately owned residences in case of divorce was a primary concern for Kevin. Having experienced homelessness after previous marriage and separation, he was determined not to be in a situation where he couldn't inhabit his own property." He did not want that "Would happen again. Due to the nature of his job, Kevin frequently works out of town, so it was and still is especially important to him that when he is home, he has a home to go to," he added. Laura Wasser, his legal representative.
