King Charles III gave the bracelet to Meghan Markle on the occasion of her wedding to Prince Harry and she has chosen to wear it in her public reappearance after the publication of Omid Scrobie's book.
The media storm produced after the publication of the book 'Endgame', by author Omid Scobie, has once again pitted the Sussexes against Buckingham Palace. Among its pages, reference is made to Harry and Meghan Markle's claims about racism in the British royal family.
Nothing indicates that a consensual peace can be reached between the parties in the coming months, but the Duchess of Sussex is giving some clues that, on her part, there is desire. At least that is what some royal observers wanted to see when they saw the former actress reappear on the streets of Santa Barbara with the bracelet that her father-in-law, King Charles III, gave her, a small gesture that could be interpreted as a White flag.
The bracelet has 92 diamonds, has a value of more than 5,700 euros and was created by jewelers Bentley & Skinner at the request of the monarch as a gift for the royal wedding in 2018. The first time she used it was on the eve of the wedding and it has It has been common for Markle to use it in her daily life after moving to the United States. The last time was in 2022.
Next to it, her bracelet from the Love de Cartier collection and Princess Diana's watch, which was her favorite and a gift from her father in the 80s and which she never stopped wear it after her divorce.
The book that has uncovered the 'racist member'
Meghan has taken this bracelet out of her jewelry box at a significant moment for the null relationship she has with her father-in-law and her brother-in-law, Prince William. In the Dutch version of Endgame the name of the person who expressed racist opinions and which referred to the first son of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex was published.
The impact caused the book to be withdrawn from the Netherlands and a review of where the name came from since it was not in the original edition. "There was no version of mine in which names were mentioned," its author explained to the RTL Boulevard program.
At the moment the Sussexes have not commented, although Omid has already assured that he is not a close friend of the couple although they have had a relationship and he is aware of many moments in his life. "I do not have a close personal relationship with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex nor am I a friend of Meghan," Scrobie said.
The Duke of Westminster, a former ally
In the midst of this controversy, the British press is rumoring the possibility that the Duke of Westminster has declined to invite Harry and Meghan to their wedding. They were close friends and Hugh is godfather to his son Archie, so everything pointed to the fact that they would be there. However, the estrangement of Princess Diana's youngest son from her circle of friends in the United Kingdom has cooled the situation.
What is confirmed is the attendance of Carlos, Camilla, Guillermo and Kate at the ceremony to be held next year in Chester. A close source tells DailyMail that Meghan and Harry are "desperate to return to the royal sphere and recently approached Charles for his 75th birthday."
