Type Here to Get Search Results !

Backgrid Confirms 5-year Contract With Harry Amid Parking Lot Photo

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, known for their penchant for attention, once again orchestrated a moment in the spotlight, with Harry conveniently photographed jogging in a Santa Barbara car park on a brisk January morning. 

Backgrid Confirms 5-year Contract With Harry Amid Parking Lot Photo

This calculated move comes amid recent reports suggesting Queen Elizabeth's displeasure with the couple's decision to name their daughter Lilibet, a childhood nickname of the late monarch. The captured images reveal Harry's serious expression as he braves the cold weather for a post-workout session in what has become a favored location for their staged photo ops.

The couple's tendency to utilize car parks as backdrops for their photo shoots didn't escape the scrutiny of keen observers. Some followers humorously commented on the living legend, as they put it, staging photos in a parking lot for his wife's directives, expressing disdain for the seemingly sloppy appearance. Critics questioned the choice of jogging in a car park, drawing parallels to past criticisms the couple directed at others for staging paparazzi shots. Speculation arose about Harry's appearance, with suggestions that he could have adopted a more polished look for the photo shoot. Observers also noted the couple's consistent gravitation towards car parks for their public appearances.

The article delves into the controversy surrounding the couple's decision to name their daughter Lilibet. Queen Elizabeth's reported anger over the use of her childhood nickname for their child is highlighted, with a member of the Queen's staff describing her reaction as one of the angriest moments witnessed. These revelations are part of the ongoing revelations from a new biography, "Charles III: New King, New Court," authored by Royal biographer Robert Hardman.

The Sussexes, responding to claims that they didn't seek permission for the name, instructed their lawyers to issue warnings against news broadcasters and publishers, including the BBC. However, attempts to involve the palace in supporting their version of events were reportedly rebuffed. Recollections about the Queen's blessing to name their daughter Lilibet remain buried, contributing to tensions between the Sussexes and the palace. Despite initial threats of legal action and claims of defamation, no lawsuits materialized against the BBC, and palace staff reportedly breathed a sigh of relief after the initial fury over the name and subsequent controversy subsided.

The article suggests that recollections about the late Queen's reaction to the Oprah Winfrey interview were inconsistent, ultimately leading to the dissolution of threats of legal action and the anticipated lawsuits against the BBC never materialized. The ongoing dynamics between the Sussexes and the royal family continue to be marked by calculated public moves and behind-the-scenes tensions.

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.