Prince Harry's recent accolade in aviation is facing scrutiny as his biographer, Angela Leavon, a seasoned journalist with a rich background in prominent publications, including the Observer, Daily Mail, and the Daily Telegraph, and author of notable books, including Prince Harry's biography, voiced reservations about the legitimacy of the award.
During Leavon's recent appearance on GB News, she questioned the credibility of the recognition, highlighting Prince Harry's limited time in Afghanistan and suggesting that the award might be one of those honors requiring payment for recognition, drawing parallels to Megan Markle's experiences.
Leavon expressed skepticism about Prince Harry being the sole decision-maker while on the plane, emphasizing that he was a companion, casting doubt on the authenticity of the award. She raised concerns about honors being potentially influenced by financial contributions rather than genuine merit.
In response, GB News reached out to AR, the organization representing the Sussexes, which vehemently denied any involvement of money in the awards. A spokesperson from AR stated, "It's categorically untrue that any money changes hands in relation to these awards."
Controversy surrounding the Living Legends of Aviation award escalated as internet users questioned its credibility, fueled by a screenshot from Wikipedia alleging that the award is paid for. Doubts about Prince Harry passing his theoretical exam further fueled skepticism.
An online petition initiated by Lady Cat SSW called for a reconsideration of Prince Harry's award, citing inaccuracies and misrepresentation by the nonprofit organization. The petition emphasized the importance of recognizing true heroes based on merit and accurate representation, rather than titles or perceived actions.
The controversy gained additional attention as Prince Harry was allegedly omitted from a new book's list of the top 200 military alumni from Sandhurst. Kent Pay's new book, "They Also Served," features notable graduates from the military academy, and the absence of Prince Harry sparked discussions about his aviation accolade.
Comments from the public expressed dissatisfaction, suggesting that the award might be perceived as purchasable and undermining the achievements of those who genuinely meet the qualifications for such honors.
