Actor Danny Masterson found himself relocated once again, this time to a minimum security correctional facility, marking his third move within a span of two months.
This transfer, shrouded in controversy, sparked speculation about Masterson's well-being in light of his previous incarceration in one of California's toughest prisons. However, insights reveal that concerns for his safety weren't the driving force behind this latest move.
Contrary to rumors circulating, Masterson encountered no physical harm or credible threats during his stint at Corcoran State Prison, dispelling notions of imminent danger to the former "That '70s Show" star. His journey through the California penal system began earlier this year at North Kern State Prison, a medium-security establishment in Delano. From there, he was swiftly relocated to a maximum-security facility that once housed notorious figures like Charles Manson.
Following a brief interlude at Corcoran, Masterson found himself settling into the California Men's Colony in San Luis Obispo, a shift towards a more relaxed custodial environment. North Kern, serving primarily as a processing center, merely marked the initial step in Masterson's incarceration journey, ensuring his temporary stay before onward movement.
Reports from TMZ shed light on Masterson's placement within the correctional system, indicating predetermined primary and secondary facilities post-North Kern processing. The California Men's Colony served as the primary destination, with Corcoran as the backup. Whether these choices stemmed from Masterson's preferences or institutional protocols remains ambiguous.
The latest relocation, far from signaling imminent threats or safety concerns, aligns with logistical considerations within the correctional system. A vacancy at the California Men's Colony prompted Masterson's transfer, affording him more comfortable accommodations as he navigates his 30-year prison sentence for charges of abusing multiple women. Thus, while his movements may raise eyebrows, they primarily reflect administrative adjustments rather than heightened security measures.
