Megan's ambitions for a children's clothing line have been circulating for quite some time, echoing whispers from the industry.
Will she leverage her unique upbringing to craft a line that's truly one-of-a-kind? Speculation abounds as The Source hinted at Megan Markle's desire to venture into the world of children's fashion, viewing it as an untapped market she can dominate. Sources close to the couple suggest that Megan's entrepreneurial spirit is driven by a desire for financial independence, prompting her and Harry to rebrand their offspring and launch sussex.ac.uk, a move that's raised eyebrows and fueled rumors.
Despite claims made during the Oprah interview, insiders allege that Buckingham Palace is prepared to take legal action against Megan for capitalizing on the Sussex title, which was trademarked well before their departure from royal duties.
While Megan may have portrayed herself as naive to Harry, behind the scenes, she's been orchestrating her business ventures meticulously, leveraging her charm to sway even the most skeptical. However, recent revelations about the acquisition of sussex.edu have added another layer to the narrative, sparking debates about the couple's intentions and their perceived detachment from royal protocols.
The purchase of sussex.edu has raised questions about the Sussexes' motives, with critics accusing them of indulging in self-aggrandizement at the expense of their royal ties. Christopher Smithers' incisive critique highlights the perception that Harry and Megan exploit their royal connections while conveniently sidestepping obligations.
Critics argue that the couple's actions betray a sense of entitlement, as they navigate the delicate balance between celebrity and duty. Many observers speculate that Harry, overshadowed by Megan's influence, has become detached from reality, forsaking traditional royal engagements in favor of pursuing their personal agenda. The Sussexes' unilateral approach to diplomacy and representation has left them isolated from the royal establishment, raising doubts about their long-term viability as ambassadors of the monarchy.
