In a senior meeting held early on February 13th, discussions centered on the potential stripping of titles from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as they launched a new website.
The quiet unveiling of website raised concerns among royal insiders about its implications, particularly regarding the use of the Sussex titles and their extension to the couple's children. According to one source, the perception among the public would likely associate the creators of the website with the royal family, leading to accusations of exploitation.
Insider Michael Cole expressed skepticism about the reception of the website within Buckingham Palace, suggesting that it may not have been well-received among palace officials. Speaking on a talk TV show, Cole emphasized the need for caution regarding any potential commercial use of the website, warning that such actions would not be tolerated, especially in the UK. The move was seen as tone-deaf and potentially damaging to efforts to mend relationships within the royal family.
Reports of a high-level security meeting related to the new website further highlighted concerns about its implications. Given that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle no longer hold official roles within the British royal family, the nature of their latest endeavor raised eyebrows and prompted discussions about its legality and appropriateness. Some speculated that the move could backfire, potentially weakening the positions of King Charles and Prince William in the line of succession.
Calls from members of Parliament to strip Harry and Meghan of their titles gained traction following King Charles's recent cancer diagnosis. Many had hoped that the seriousness of the health crisis would lead to a reconciliation between Harry and the royal family. However, the couple's decision to rebrand the royal website only fueled calls for action, with some arguing that it was time for King Charles to take decisive measures to restore order within the monarchy.
