In this moment, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry find themselves amidst unparalleled levels of public disfavor, prompting major brands to distance themselves from their controversial image.
As per insights from a royal expert, the couple's efforts at rebranding have faltered, failing to garner support from PR professionals who are hesitant to align with them in a bid to salvage their public image. Resorting to desperate measures, Meghan has initiated endeavors like launching a lemonade stand, revamping a website, and introducing the Tig 2.0. Despite their persistent efforts, they face continued rejection.
Specialist KLA Spate, speaking to The Mirror, highlighted the reluctance among many PR experts to take on their brand, asserting that the situation appears bleak. However, amidst the adversity, Spate acknowledged that the couple still retains a significant support base, and there's a growing sentiment of fatigue among the public regarding the incessant criticism they face. Rather than a complete rebranding, Spate emphasized the need for Harry and Meghan to redirect attention towards their positive contributions. However, despite Spate's assertions, examples of Harry and Meghan's positive endeavors were notably absent.
Spate further suggested that the couple should accentuate the positives in their professional lives and highlight what resonates well with their supporters. Nevertheless, Spate's defense seemed to overlook the recent setbacks, such as being dropped by Spotify and branded as "effing grifters." Can positivity be derived from such a situation? Nonetheless, Spate continued to defend the couple, emphasizing the positive impact of their work, despite it being overshadowed by Hollywood drama in recent years.
Meanwhile, Meghan reportedly finds herself engaged in a subtle competition with products from High Grove Gardens, attempting to outshine them with her own line of luxury goods, promoted on Instagram. This move was met with skepticism, as observed by Lin Carrot from Pressbox PR, who questioned the practicality and appeal of Megan's extravagant products. Carrot pointed out the disparity between Megan's ostentatious lifestyle and the financial realities of many potential consumers, who are unlikely to splurge on such luxury items.
Interestingly, keen-eyed internet sleuths have drawn parallels between Meghan's purported exclusive products and those offered by High Grove Gardens, available at Fortnum and Mason in London. This revelation raises eyebrows, suggesting that Megan might be indulging in a copying spree. Fortnum and Mason, with their royal warrants, are not taking this lightly, setting the stage for potential legal disputes. Megan's aspirations of being a modern-day Renaissance woman may be clouded by the looming shadow of accusations of imitation.
In her bid to compete with established brands, Megan's latest endeavor seems poised for disappointment. Despite her aspirations, the reality may be that her American Dreamland clashes with the established order, leaving her title as the Duchess of Knockoffs more of a cautionary tale than a triumph.
