Meghan Markle and Prince Harry made a formal request to the Nigeria Defense Headquarters to address them with their HRH titles.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's upcoming journey to Nigeria has sparked controversy, with critics accusing them of orchestrating their own parallel royal venture. Despite not being an official royal visit, the couple accepted an invitation from Nigeria's Chief of Defense Staff to participate in cultural engagements and meet with service members. Some royal observers perceive this move as the couple's attempt to enjoy the benefits of royal status while pursuing their independent endeavors.
Brigadier General Tuku Gaso expressed his delight at the couple's acceptance of the invitation, citing their previous encounter at the Invictus Games. However, the timing of their visit is notable, as it coincides with Prince Harry's attendance at the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games in the UK. While the royal family won't be present at the UK event, Harry will swiftly fly to Nigeria afterward. His wife, Meghan, is not expected to accompany him due to her ongoing health concerns following Kate's recent cancer diagnosis.
This unofficial visit has raised eyebrows among royal experts, who argue that despite lacking official status, it effectively serves as a royal tour. The continued use of HRH titles by Meghan and Harry further complicates diplomatic matters and blurs the lines of their royal involvement. Critics argue that Prince Charles, as the head of the family, should address this issue promptly to maintain the integrity of royal titles.
In response to inquiries, a spokesperson for Meghan and Harry emphasized the Defense Headquarters' honor at hosting the Duke and Duchess. However, they clarified that the couple can no longer use their HRH titles and must be addressed as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Concerns persist regarding the couple's reception as dignitaries, despite their unofficial status, and the potential for diplomatic missteps during their visit.
The trip to Nigeria presents a unique set of challenges, particularly regarding cultural sensitivities and protocol. Without the support of palace staff, Meghan's actions and attire may face heightened scrutiny, potentially risking offense to Nigerian dignitaries. Additionally, the historical context adds complexity, as Nigeria is no longer a colony, and citizens retain the right to extend invitations independently. The irony of Meghan's supposed Nigerian heritage further complicates perceptions, highlighting the complexities of modern royal engagements and the evolving nature of diplomatic relations.
