Meghan Markle, The Duchess of Sussex and former "Suits" actress, is reportedly planning to endorse Kamala Harris for the presidency, as reported by the Hindustan Times, citing journalist T Das Manra.
This endorsement might signify a growing alliance between Markle and Harris in a potential bid against Donald Trump. Markle's political leanings, which align with progressive causes, are well-documented and predate her life as a royal. Her potential endorsement of Harris could be seen as a strategic move to further her own political ambitions. However, critics argue that Markle's endorsement may be driven more by self-interest than genuine support for Harris's campaign.
In 2020, Meghan Markle expressed her enthusiasm for Kamala Harris's candidacy, sharing her excitement with activist Gloria Steinem. Markle, who identifies as biracial, highlighted the significance of having someone who resembles her in a position of power. Despite her positive remarks, some critics argue that Markle tends to center discussions around herself rather than focusing on the broader impact of the candidate or cause. Markle's involvement in political advocacy has continued even after stepping down from royal duties, a move that has drawn criticism due to the British royal family's tradition of remaining apolitical.
Royal commentator Kinsey Schofield discussed the potential ramifications of an endorsement from Markle and Prince Harry on GB News. A poll conducted by Newsweek revealed that 40% of respondents might be influenced by such an endorsement, though Schofield did not specify whether this influence would be favorable or detrimental. Concerns are growing that an endorsement from Markle could negatively affect Harris's campaign. Markle's popularity has waned over the years, partly due to strained relationships with her in-laws and her estranged father, as well as allegations of historical revisionism and insincerity. These factors could potentially make her endorsement less appealing to voters and detrimental to Harry's image.
Since stepping down from royal duties and moving to California in 2020, speculation about Markle's political ambitions has been prevalent. Although she has not officially declared any intention to pursue a political career, Schofield has expressed doubts about her suitability for the political arena, remarking, "I don't feel like she has tough enough skin, but I do believe this is important to her." Critics point out that using a British royal title to endorse a U.S. presidential candidate may not have the impact Markle anticipates. Additionally, Prince Harry's previous criticisms of aspects of American politics and freedom of speech may undermine their influence.
Following a series of rejections and misunderstandings, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry have faced considerable setbacks in their attempts to integrate into high-profile Democratic circles. Their request for a ride on Air Force One was turned down by the Bidens, and Jill Biden appeared puzzled by a basket of lemons that Markle had sent her. Further confusion arose when Markle wore a dress adorned with lemons, seemingly intended as a nod to the First Lady. The couple's attempts to gain favor with influential Democrats have not fared well, as they were excluded from numerous events hosted by the Obamas and Clintons, including parties, fundraisers, and dinners. Michelle Obama has publicly expressed a personal distaste for Markle. Furthermore, the Clooneys, who are well-known Democratic supporters, have distanced themselves from Markle, and Oprah Winfrey, a prominent figure in the Democratic Party, has notably avoided any engagement with her.
Given these circumstances, the credibility and impact of any endorsement Markle might offer are questionable. Whether one supports or opposes Kamala Harris, it seems unlikely that Markle's endorsement would carry significant weight. Her attempts at gaining political influence have so far been met with skepticism and rejection, raising doubts about the effectiveness of her endorsement in shaping political outcomes.
