In a recent YouTube video, Lady C shared her perspective on Prince Harry's ongoing lawsuit and its potential consequences, particularly highlighting the constitutional crisis that could ensue if Harry were to be charged with a crime.
She pointed out that no Prince of the blood has faced criminal charges for centuries, and such an unprecedented event would necessitate significant action from the Crown. Lady C addressed speculations that King Charles's meetings with constitutional advisers might be an effort to prevent Harry from facing charges. However, she dismissed this notion, arguing that Prince Harry's involvement with News Group Newspapers (NGN), part of Rupert Murdoch's anti-monarchist organization, makes it unlikely for him to receive any favoritism.
She stated that the King suppressing evidence would be dishonorable and noted that there is ample evidence showing Harry's failure to provide necessary information. This situation has shifted the legal responsibility onto Harry, placing him in a precarious position. Lady C compared this situation to the Watergate scandal involving President Nixon, predicting that King Charles would distance himself from Harry to avoid being implicated.
Harry's lawsuit against NGN poses significant risks. If it is revealed that Harry attempted to pervert justice, especially given his privileged position, it could have disastrous consequences for him. Lady C believes that the wisest course of action for Harry would be to withdraw his claims against NGN. One viewer pointed out that it is implausible for notes from Harry's book "Spare" to have been mysteriously deleted, as legal procedures ensure that the publisher and the ghostwriter retain all records for protection. The court has ruled that NGN is entitled to view this evidence, and Lady C doubts that King Charles or his advisers would risk their positions by colluding with Harry to suppress evidence. Harry's actions have put everyone in a difficult position, making it a matter of whose reputation will be sacrificed.
A viewer highlighted Lady C's credibility by referencing her previous accurate reports on royal matters. This viewer speculated that while controversies like Harry receiving the ESPY award might fade, the scandal surrounding his alleged deletion of evidence will persist. Lady C also discussed Meghan Markle's selective involvement in Harry's affairs, noting that Meghan appears alongside Harry only when the publicity is favorable. She believes that Meghan is always strategizing to protect herself, particularly in case their marriage deteriorates.
Addressing Harry's connection to sports, Lady C mentioned his sporadic involvement, such as borrowing polo ponies. She pointed out that the head of ESPN is closely connected to Serena Williams's agent at WME, which might explain Harry receiving an ESPY award despite public outcry. Over 65,000 signatures have been collected on a petition to revoke this award. Lady C noted that Mary Tillman, who shares the honor with her son, does not approve of Harry. She further confirmed that Serena Williams's husband is an investor in BetterUp, a company associated with Harry. Lady C criticized Harry and Meghan for being devious and dishonest, referencing Meghan's previous dishonesty in court and Harry's current legal troubles.
Lady C compared Harry's situation to that of Rebecca Vardy, who faced no prosecution despite lying in a case with Colleen Rooney, implying that judges often go easy on liars. A viewer recalled Lady C's prediction from a year ago about Harry and Meghan's potential separation, noting that Meghan seems to control the situation. There were also speculative rumors about King Charles visiting California, which Lady C dismissed as unfounded.
