Recent speculations have emerged about Meghan Markle's access to private jets, sparked by a recent blind item that suggests she was denied use of a friend's private jet.
The item, which refers to Meghan as "the entitled one," alleges that she was barred from the jet due to her behavior of treating it as though it were her own, without securing permission. The friend in question could potentially be someone like Oprah Winfrey or Tyler Perry, given Meghan's connections with wealthy individuals. However, evidence points particularly strongly towards Tyler Perry.
Perry, known for his support of Meghan and Harry, was recently reported by the Daily Mail to have arrived in Montecito on a $125 million jet to visit the couple. Perry's previous acts of generosity include the Freedom Flight, which helped Meghan and Harry during their transition from royal duties. Given this history, it is conceivable that Meghan might have overstepped boundaries with Perry's jet.
The Daily Mail report indicates that Tyler Perry's visit to Montecito involved arriving on a $125 million jet, which could have influenced Meghan's expectations of access to private jets. Given her accustomed lifestyle of luxury, it would not be surprising if Meghan assumed that access to Perry’s jet was a given. One can imagine a scenario where Meghan might have attempted to arrange a private flight without obtaining proper authorization, reflecting her perceived sense of entitlement. This notion aligns with broader perceptions of Meghan's behavior and her tendency to overlook boundaries.
Another instance highlighted by Page Six further underscores this narrative. The article criticized Meghan and Harry for accepting another complimentary private jet ride, suggesting that the couple has a preference for others to cover their travel expenses. This incident involved the Invictus Games, where Meghan and Harry allegedly took a private jet from Montecito to Vancouver and Whistler, charging the cost to the Games.
This pattern of relying on the generosity of others or external funding rather than personal expenditure is consistent with previous reports. Additionally, during a trip to Nigeria, Meghan and Harry reportedly flew first class on a commercial flight after being unable to secure a complimentary private jet. Despite not using a private jet, the couple’s reliance on external resources, particularly when expenses were charged to Invictus, highlights a broader tendency to depend on others.
The narrative around Meghan's actions has also drawn attention due to public disclosures about financial deficiencies related to the Rell Foundation, exacerbating perceptions of her entitlement. While Harry, having grown up in affluence, might exhibit an understanding of boundaries and class, Meghan’s actions often suggest otherwise. The idea that she might book a private jet flight without the owner's consent seems plausible given her history of perceived entitlement.
This behavior has reportedly strained her relationships with benefactors such as Tyler Perry. The potential loss of such privileges points to a broader issue: Meghan's diminishing support network. Her perceived sense of entitlement and disregard for boundaries may be eroding valuable friendships and alliances. The ongoing narrative surrounding Meghan Markle's use of private jets paints a picture of entitlement and dependence on others' resources. Whether the latest blind item specifically refers to Tyler Perry or another affluent friend, the implications are clear: Meghan’s actions might be leading to a significant loss of trust and support among her wealthy connections.
