The birth of a royal child is typically a time of joyous celebration, a grand event steeped in centuries of tradition.
However, when Meghan Markle and Prince Harry welcomed their children, the atmosphere was far from one of transparent joy. Instead, their births became shrouded in secrecy, intrigue, and unanswered questions. Why were the births of Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor surrounded by such mystery, especially when compared to the straightforward announcements for Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis? There were cryptic announcements, shifting timelines, and rampant speculation.
According to Lady Colin Campbell, a well-known royal commentator, this isn't by accident. She claims that Meghan, knowing the power of mystery, is strategically capitalizing on it. But is there more to this than just another sensational headline, or is there a deeper truth lurking beneath the surface? Buckle up, because this is royal drama at its finest.
The British royal family is known for its adherence to tradition, particularly when it comes to significant events like the birth of a child. For generations, there’s been a formula: a hospital photo op, a framed proclamation placed outside Buckingham Palace, and royal family visits within days. This was the norm for royal births—like Kate Middleton’s, where she posed for photos hours after giving birth. But the births of Archie and Lilibet were anything but traditional. No public photo op, conflicting birth announcements, and reports that even senior royals weren’t informed right away. There were also rumors that the children had not even been seen with Queen Elizabeth II. The secrecy surrounding the births raised a glaring question: why all the mystery? Lady Colin Campbell suggests that Meghan’s approach is deliberate—using mystery to capture attention, build fame, and ultimately, increase wealth. But is this just speculation, or is there a more deliberate strategy at play?
The confusing birth announcement for Archie in 2019 stands out as one of the most puzzling moments in this saga. Initially, Buckingham Palace announced that Meghan had gone into labor early in the morning, only to announce 20 minutes later that Meghan had already given birth. This timeline raised serious questions—why announce labor when the child had already been born? The slip-up sparked wild theories, some claiming Meghan delayed the announcement for dramatic effect, others whispering about a potential cover-up. There’s no concrete evidence supporting these claims, but the couple's reluctance to follow tradition didn’t help silence the rumors. And if they wanted privacy, why sign a multi-million-dollar Netflix deal? The contradictions only fueled further curiosity.
Lady Colin Campbell argues that Meghan and Harry are well aware of the modern media landscape and the power of intrigue. The less people know, the more they want to know. Every time the couple retreats from the public eye, speculation intensifies. Cryptic comments or half-reveals in interviews send the press into overdrive. Their Netflix and Spotify deals are built on the ability to remain elusive, ensuring that their names are never far from the headlines. By keeping just enough mystery alive, they maintain their place in the media spotlight.
To add fuel to the fire, Meghan’s estranged half-sister, Samantha Markle, recently stirred the pot by suggesting that the existence of Archie and Lilibet is questionable. While she never outright claimed the children don’t exist, she hinted at such extreme secrecy that it raised doubts. Of course, these claims are baseless, but they tap into a broader public skepticism surrounding the Sussexes’ narrative. Samantha also pointed out that the couple’s self-imposed exile has kept their children from meeting much of the royal family. If they truly wanted to maintain family ties, why didn’t they make an effort to introduce their children to their royal relatives? Instead, the Sussexes have remained distant, dropping occasional bombshells that keep them at the center of royal gossip.
Another key player in this saga is Princess Diana, whose legacy Meghan and Harry have clearly embraced. From naming Lilibet after Diana to drawing comparisons between Meghan’s media struggles and those of Diana, the Sussexes have woven Diana’s story into their own. But is this a heartfelt homage or a savvy PR move? Lady Colin Campbell and other royal commentators believe it’s a calculated strategy. By aligning Meghan with Diana, they tap into a well of public sympathy and nostalgia, ensuring their own narrative remains tied to one of the most beloved figures in royal history. But is this fair to Meghan? Is she genuinely following in Diana’s footsteps, or is it simply a branding tactic? The jury is still out.
So, what’s the truth behind all this? Are Meghan and Harry the masterminds of mystery, carefully controlling their own narrative, or are they genuinely seeking privacy in a world that refuses to leave them alone? As always, the truth is likely somewhere in between. What’s undeniable is that they have rewritten the rulebook on royal fame. Whether you love them, hate them, or remain neutral, Meghan and Harry have managed to control their own story in a way no royal before them has. And that, more than anything, may explain why they remain the most talked-about royals in the world.
If there’s one thing Meghan and Harry have mastered, it’s staying relevant. Through strategic leaks, interviews, lawsuits, and well-timed statements, they have managed to keep themselves in the spotlight. But the big question remains: are they victims of relentless media scrutiny, or do they deliberately keep themselves in the public eye? Let’s take a closer look at some of the key moments that have fueled this ongoing media machine.
One of the most high-profile moments came in 2021, when Meghan and Harry sat down with Oprah Winfrey for a bombshell interview. Meghan shared her struggles within the royal family, made accusations of racism, and revealed her unhappiness. The interview was explosive, but one thing seemed off—weren’t they supposed to be seeking privacy? Going on Oprah doesn’t scream privacy. Signing multimillion-dollar deals with Netflix and Spotify doesn’t say “quiet life.” What became clear is that Meghan and Harry wanted to control their own story, but on their own terms. And while that’s entirely fair, it does contradict their narrative of seeking privacy.
Another controversial moment came with the naming of their daughter, Lilibet, after Queen Elizabeth II. Initially thought to be a personal tribute, the name sparked debate when it was revealed that the Queen hadn’t given her explicit approval. Was this a heartfelt gesture, or a calculated PR move to tie their daughter to royal history and provoke the institution they had criticized? Depending on who you ask, it could be either a sentimental tribute or a power play.
Lady Colin Campbell suggests that Meghan’s ultimate goal was never to just be a duchess—it was to become a celebrity on an A-list scale. Before meeting Harry, Meghan had moderate fame from her role on Suits, but it was marrying a prince that catapulted her to global recognition. However, instead of following the traditional royal path like Kate Middleton, Meghan seemed to rewrite the script. She wanted privacy, yet launched a podcast. She stepped back from royal duties, yet continued to leverage her connections to build her brand. If Lady C’s theory holds, Meghan saw the monarchy as a stepping stone to Hollywood-level fame, and that meant creating an air of mystery, drama, and intrigue.
While Meghan often takes center stage, Prince Harry’s role in all of this cannot be ignored. Harry has always had a complicated relationship with the media, especially after the tragic loss of his mother, Princess Diana. His disdain for the press is understandable, yet since stepping back from royal duties, Harry has written a tell-all memoir, produced a Netflix documentary, and given numerous interviews revealing family conflicts. For someone who claims to despise media intrusion, he certainly spends a lot of time speaking to the press. So, is Harry simply a reluctant participant in Meghan’s Hollywood ambitions, or has he embraced his new role as a royal rebel? One thing is certain: the Harry we see today is not the same prince who once swore loyalty to the crown.
Meanwhile, the royal family’s response has been one of strategic silence. They continue to adhere to their motto, “never complain, never explain,” but in a world of 24/7 media, is this strategy still effective? When Meghan and Harry are constantly in the media, giving interviews, writing books, and releasing documentaries, the royal family’s silence often comes across as outdated, allowing for endless speculation. And who benefits from this? Meghan and Harry, of course. Every unanswered question keeps them in the media spotlight, feeding public curiosity and fueling their media machine.
