Netflix’s upcoming cooking show featuring Meghan Markle has sparked widespread debate and controversy.
For many, the announcement of the show is shocking—not because of its content, but because it represents what critics are calling a glaring miscalculation. Some wonder how Netflix, in an apparent bid to boost its original programming, decided to hand over millions of dollars to a celebrity with no proven culinary background. The decision seems to align with Netflix’s recent history of producing polarizing content, leaving subscribers questioning the platform's priorities.
The premise of Meghan’s show has drawn sharp criticism. Dubbed by some as a vanity project, it appears to center on elaborate culinary creations, far removed from the relatable charm that defines traditional cooking shows. Meghan, who has carved a niche for herself as a lifestyle influencer, is now venturing into a realm where her expertise—or lack thereof—is under scrutiny. Critics claim the show feels more like an expensive self-promotion campaign rather than an earnest attempt to celebrate cooking.
One recurring complaint is the perception that the show caters to a narrow, privileged audience. Social media reactions have described it as out-of-touch and unrelatable, with elaborate recipes and extravagant presentation that seem inaccessible to everyday viewers. This perceived exclusivity has sparked frustration among Netflix subscribers, who feel the show ignores the principles of simplicity and authenticity that make cooking programs resonate with audiences.
The backlash was immediate and intense following the show’s announcement. Social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) became hubs of discontent, with users lambasting everything from the show’s aesthetic to its overall concept. Critics labeled it tone-deaf and outdated, likening it to a relic from the mid-2000s. Many questioned Netflix’s judgment, pointing out that this isn’t the first time the streaming giant has faced criticism for backing controversial projects involving Meghan Markle.
Observers argue that Meghan’s royal connection played a pivotal role in Netflix green-lighting the show. Without her marriage to Prince Harry, many believe this project would never have materialized. Meghan’s acting career, while noteworthy, lacked the star power typically associated with leading large-scale productions. Her current status as an influencer, some claim, is heavily bolstered by her royal ties rather than her individual merits.
Amidst all this criticism, many Netflix subscribers are questioning whether their rising subscription fees are being used wisely. Some vow to cancel their subscriptions, citing frustration with what they perceive as a series of missteps by the platform. For these viewers, Meghan Markle’s cooking show epitomizes a broader problem: the prioritization of high-profile names over meaningful, relatable content.
Whether the show succeeds or fails remains to be seen. For now, it has undoubtedly sparked conversations about the direction of streaming content and the risks of banking on celebrity-driven projects. If nothing else, Meghan’s cooking venture serves as a case study in the power—and pitfalls—of combining fame with an untested format. Only time will tell if Netflix’s gamble will pay off, or if this project will join the growing list of over-hyped ventures that missed the mark.
