There’s never a dull moment when it comes to the British royal family, especially when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are involved.
From their dramatic departure from royal life to their new chapter in California, they continue to be the center of both admiration and controversy. Just when it seemed like every possible story had been told, Meghan’s longtime hairdresser, George Northwood, shared a rare glimpse into the lives of Archie and Lilibet. His seemingly innocent Instagram post ignited excitement among fans, sparked speculation, and, of course, fueled more controversy. While many were delighted by an unexpected update on the couple’s children, critics quickly raised questions, and whispers of deeper tensions began circulating.
Northwood recently posted a series of nostalgic photos from the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee, a gesture that few expected to offer such an intimate insight into Meghan and Harry’s family life. His caption read, “So nostalgic and wonderful to be reunited with Harry, Meghan, and their family in the UK. Archie has grown to be the cutest, well-mannered little boy, and Lilibet is just beautiful.” For fans who rarely get glimpses into the Sussexes’ private life, this was a golden moment of insider information. Social media erupted with enthusiastic reactions, with fans flooding the comments with praise for Meghan and Harry. But as with anything royal-related, positive news often comes with an undercurrent of drama.
For every devoted supporter, there is always a critic waiting to scrutinize. One name that started surfacing in the backlash was Miguel—an outspoken figure or possibly a royal insider whose reaction to Northwood’s post caught attention. The phrase “I beg you, Miguel” began circulating on social media, as though someone was pleading with him to withhold further revelations. What was he holding back? Speculation quickly followed. Some argued that Meghan and Harry use these carefully timed updates to maintain public interest while still controlling their level of exposure. Others believed the post was a subtle attempt to reassert their presence in the royal narrative, especially considering reports that the Sussexes had left the Jubilee celebrations early after being seated away from senior royals. There were also those who suggested the message was designed to counter growing criticism that Harry and Meghan are isolating their children from their royal heritage.
Northwood’s words may have been meant as a simple, heartfelt message, but royal watchers read between the lines. His description of Archie as “well-mannered” was seen by some as a subtle jab at those who claim the Sussexes’ departure from the royal family would have a negative impact on their children’s upbringing. His remark about Lilibet’s beauty was interpreted as reassurance that she is thriving despite her limited interaction with the royal family. Yet, what stood out most was what wasn’t said—there was no acknowledgment of the Sussexes’ relationship with the rest of the royal family.
Royal expert Katie Nicholl weighed in on the ongoing tension, pointing to Meghan and Harry’s early departure from the Jubilee as evidence that they were unhappy with their placement at the event. Traditionally, senior working royals are given priority seating, meaning that Harry and Meghan—no longer working royals—would have been positioned behind others. For a couple accustomed to commanding headlines, this may have been a difficult adjustment. Did they leave early out of frustration, prioritizing optics over family unity?
Adding another layer to the drama, Lilibet’s first birthday fell during the Jubilee weekend. Though members of the royal family publicly wished her a happy birthday, their messages were noticeably brief and lacked the warmth typically seen in posts about Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis. This contrast led to speculation about whether the royal family was intentionally keeping their distance or if the Sussexes themselves were drawing boundaries. Regardless of who is responsible, the emotional distance between Harry, Meghan, and the royal family is becoming increasingly evident.
At the heart of all this speculation are two young children, Archie and Lilibet, who are growing up away from their royal cousins, traditions, and extended family. Some experts believe Harry and Meghan have no intention of bringing them back into the royal fold, while others argue that Harry still holds a deep emotional connection to his past. Could King Charles extend an olive branch that leads to genuine reconciliation, or has too much damage been done?
Although Meghan and Harry have distanced themselves from royal duties, their children still hold royal titles. Following Queen Elizabeth II’s passing, Archie and Lilibet automatically became Prince and Princess under royal tradition. However, the debate over whether they will be officially acknowledged as such continues. Reports suggest that the Sussexes are torn between wanting their children to have titles and fearing that doing so may impose unwanted expectations.
Beyond royal protocol, the Sussexes face ongoing scrutiny for their approach to privacy. They have taken legal action against the press for intrusion yet have also signed high-profile media deals, including a Netflix series and Meghan’s podcast. Critics accuse them of wanting to control their narrative while selectively engaging with the public. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that they should have the right to share their story on their own terms. Can they truly maintain a private life while remaining in the global spotlight, or is this balance their only means of controlling how they are portrayed?
