The birth of Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor on June 4, 2021, at first seemed like an ordinary event. However, upon closer examination, this date holds an uncanny connection to Princess Diana.
It coincides with the 25th anniversary of Diana's visit to Northwestern University, the same institution Meghan Markle later attended. This seemingly minor detail has sparked debate among royal watchers, leading to speculation about whether this was a mere coincidence or a calculated decision by Meghan. Given Meghan’s well-documented admiration for Diana, the timing of Lilibet’s birth has raised eyebrows. Was this an orchestrated tribute, a curious twist of fate, or simply a case of overanalyzing royal events?
Meghan Markle has never hidden her deep admiration for Princess Diana. From wearing the late princess’s jewelry to emulating her fashion choices, Meghan has frequently drawn parallels between herself and her mother-in-law. Her engagement ring even features diamonds from Diana’s personal collection, reinforcing the symbolic connection. Furthermore, Meghan’s media approach—such as her explosive Oprah interview and her Netflix docuseries—bears striking similarities to Diana’s iconic Panorama interview. Even their philanthropic interests align, with both women advocating for women’s rights, mental health awareness, and humanitarian causes. Now, with the timing of Lilibet’s birth linking back to Diana’s legacy, the question arises: could Meghan have planned this? While birth dates are generally beyond anyone’s control, modern medical advancements, including scheduled C-sections, allow for some influence. The idea that Meghan might have deliberately orchestrated this date only adds fuel to the ongoing debate about her fascination with Diana.
Beyond the birth date, Lilibet Diana’s name itself became a subject of royal controversy. "Lilibet" was Queen Elizabeth II’s personal childhood nickname, used only by close family members. This raised questions about whether Harry and Meghan genuinely intended to honor the Queen or if they were strategically tying their daughter to the royal family despite stepping back from royal duties. Some royal experts suggest that the name choice served as a permanent link to the monarchy, ensuring their daughter remained connected to royal heritage. Others believe it was another tribute to Diana, reinforcing Meghan and Harry’s desire to keep her memory alive. When considering both the name and the timing of her birth, it’s hard not to wonder whether these decisions were entirely coincidental or part of a larger narrative.
Fast forward to 2023, and Meghan reportedly expressed frustration over how her children were treated by the royal family. The coronation of King Charles III fell on the same day as Prince Archie’s fourth birthday—a day Meghan allegedly wanted to focus entirely on her son. However, Archie and Lilibet were not included in any official royal events, unlike Prince William and Kate’s children, who had prominent roles. This reportedly left Meghan upset, questioning why her children were treated differently despite their royal lineage. However, historical context suggests otherwise. When Queen Elizabeth II was crowned, a four-year-old King Charles was present but found the experience dull. Royal insiders argue that excluding young children from such lengthy and formal events was not a snub but a practical decision. Meghan’s frustrations extended beyond the coronation, as reports indicated that she and Harry wanted a place on the Buckingham Palace balcony—a privilege reserved for working royals. Their request was denied, adding another layer of tension between them and the royal family.
Royal expert Daniela Elser has argued that Harry and Meghan’s approach to media exposure is reaching a saturation point. Their public revelations have largely centered around the same grievances: the royal family was unwelcoming, Meghan was mistreated, the press was unfair, and they were financially cut off. While these claims initially sparked intense public interest, repeated accusations are losing their impact. Just like the fable of the boy who cried wolf, constant repetition may diminish credibility. Unless the Sussexes introduce new bombshell revelations, future tell-alls may be met with indifference rather than scandal. At what point does the world move on?
Returning to the question of Lilibet’s birth, was it purely coincidental, or did Meghan have a hand in ensuring it aligned with a significant date in Diana’s history? Three possibilities emerge. First, it could have been a complete accident—an unplanned but intriguing alignment of dates. Second, it may have been planned, but not necessarily for the reason people assume. Perhaps Meghan was aware of Diana’s visit to Northwestern, and the connection was a fortunate coincidence. Lastly, it is possible that Meghan deliberately influenced the birth date to further connect her daughter to Diana’s legacy. While the truth remains uncertain, what is clear is that Meghan continues to shape her own royal narrative, whether intentionally or subconsciously. The fascination with Diana persists, and Lilibet’s birth adds yet another eerie link between Meghan and the late princess.
Looking ahead, what’s next for Harry and Meghan? Their strategy of leveraging royal drama for media deals may be losing its effectiveness. Public fatigue is setting in, and without fresh controversies, they risk fading into irrelevance. This raises the question of whether Meghan will pivot towards a political career. Speculation about her political aspirations has existed for years, with rumors suggesting she has ambitions for a Senate seat or even a presidential run. Her advocacy for gender equality, racial justice, and mental health aligns with progressive political values. She also has connections to high-profile figures such as Michelle Obama and California Governor Gavin Newsom. However, several obstacles stand in her way. Public perception remains divided, with critics viewing her as opportunistic. Her past royal controversies could undermine her credibility, making it difficult for voters to take her seriously. Moreover, she lacks formal political experience, which could hinder any serious campaign.
As for Harry, his post-royal identity remains uncertain. While his mental health advocacy work, including partnerships with organizations like BetterUp, has received some support, his credibility is often overshadowed by his personal grievances. He could strengthen his brand by fully committing to mental health initiatives, returning to military-related charities, or stepping away from media exposure altogether. If he wants to build a lasting legacy beyond his royal background, he must move beyond repeated complaints and focus on tangible actions.
One lingering question remains: will the Sussexes ever reconcile with the royal family? At this stage, King Charles has shown little interest in public reconciliation. The monarchy has weathered every Sussex scandal without significant impact, and the coronation snub signaled the palace’s firm stance. However, time may change things. As King Charles ages, there may be efforts to mend fences for the sake of legacy and unity. Prince William, though currently estranged from Harry, may take a different approach when he becomes king. Additionally, if Harry and Meghan’s influence wanes, they may strategically seek to repair ties with the royal family.
Amidst all this drama, what does the future hold for Archie and Lilibet? Unlike their royal cousins, they are being raised without direct ties to the monarchy. While they were granted prince and princess titles in 2023, they will not use them in daily life. Their education and upbringing in the U.S. will be vastly different from their royal relatives. As they grow older, they may choose to embrace their royal heritage or reject it entirely. Either way, their lives will remain under public scrutiny.
Ultimately, was Lilibet’s birth an eerie coincidence or a carefully crafted moment? While there is no definitive proof of deliberate planning, the timing, name choice, and broader patterns in Meghan’s behavior make it difficult to dismiss. Whether by chance or design, Lilibet’s birth solidifies Meghan’s connection to Diana’s legacy, adding another layer to the ongoing royal saga. As for Harry and Meghan, they stand at a crossroads. Will they continue to rely on their royal past, or will they carve out a new identity for themselves? The world watches to see their next move.
