Andrew McCarthy, once a beloved actor turned controversial documentarian, has just made a stunning revelation that is shaking the media.
His latest documentary, Bratz, questions one of the most highly publicized pregnancies in recent memory—Meghan Markle's pregnancy with Archie Harrison. Rather than raising harmless inquiries, the film boldly challenges the legitimacy of Meghan's pregnancy, drawing on expert analysis, archival footage, and testimony from insiders who claim that something about the entire affair seemed off.
When Meghan first announced her pregnancy, the world was enthralled, but according to McCarthy’s documentary, there were a number of inconsistencies and strange moments that did not add up. One of the most talked-about aspects is Meghan's baby bump, which appeared to change shape and size in ways that defied medical explanation. At times, it seemed smaller, and at others, much larger, as though it could somehow be adjusted. Another point of controversy is a viral video that conspiracy theorists have scrutinized for years, showing Meghan allegedly in her third trimester effortlessly squatting and springing back up with the ease of a gymnast. Many believe this is highly unusual, if not impossible, for a woman so far along in her pregnancy. Experts in body language, maternity health, and even prosthetics have weighed in, offering opinions that make even the most skeptical observers question the situation.
Adding more fuel to the fire, the documentary features testimony from royal insiders, some of whom claim to have witnessed behind-the-scenes events that cast doubt on Meghan’s pregnancy. Some suggest that a prosthetic baby bump may have been used, while others imply the possibility of surrogacy. While the film stops short of directly questioning the existence of Archie himself, it leaves viewers with an unsettling sense of doubt. What really happened? Was the royal family hiding something, and if so, why?
The release of Bratz has ignited a storm of controversy, with social media ablaze with fierce debates. Some praise McCarthy as a courageous investigative journalist exposing a potential cover-up, while others dismiss him as a conspiracy theorist seeking attention by capitalizing on royal drama. Supporters of Meghan call the film an outrageous attack, accusing McCarthy of spreading baseless rumors and further vilifying a woman already facing relentless public scrutiny. Yet, Bratz seems to touch on something deeper that makes it impossible to ignore. It taps into a larger conversation about the way narratives are crafted, and how the media and monarchy influence public perception. McCarthy argues that the real story is not just about Meghan's pregnancy but about the power of carefully curated images and the ways in which truth can be distorted and manipulated to fit a desired narrative.
Let’s not overlook the historical context: the British royal family has a long history of secrecy, scandal, and controlled messaging. From the cover-ups surrounding Princess Diana’s personal life to Prince Andrew’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the monarchy has perfected the art of damage control. Could Meghan’s pregnancy have been yet another meticulously staged piece of royal theater?
As the controversy grows, one thing is certain: Bratz isn't going to fade quietly. The public is engaged, asking questions, debating, and searching for answers. Will the royal family respond? Will Meghan herself address the claims, or will silence only fuel more speculation? And what about Archie Harrison? If the world begins to question the reality of Meghan's pregnancy, how will it affect the young boy at the heart of the matter? The implications are staggering, and the discussions sparked by Bratz are just beginning. McCarthy may have opened Pandora’s box, and now the world is left to wonder just how deep this rabbit hole really goes.
