Meghan Markle has once again proven that she can make absolutely everything about herself, surpassing even the most cynical expectations. Her latest Netflix series, With Love, Meghan, takes self-absorption to levels previously unimaginable.
Despite all the effort and resources poured into the show, its March 4th release was met with lackluster interest—only 526,000 households tuned in during the first five days. For someone who constantly reminds the world of her acting career on a cable TV legal drama, these numbers are nothing short of humiliating. But the real shocker? Producers reportedly had to step in and edit the series because Meghan couldn't stop talking about herself long enough to interview her own guests.
The editing disaster was glaringly obvious in the second episode, which featured Mindy Kaling. Mindy, a talented and charismatic figure, deserved much better than being reduced to a supporting character in Meghan’s one-woman show. Throughout the episode, she mostly nods and compliments Meghan, while the Duchess rambles endlessly—about herself, of course. The most blatant example of this comes toward the end when the show suddenly cuts to Mindy discussing her childhood. However, Meghan’s voice is dubbed over, awkwardly asking, "What kind of things did you like to do as a kid?" As commentator Megyn Kelly pointed out, this was a manufactured moment, exposing how the producers had to create the illusion that Meghan was actually interested in her guest. Just imagine being in the editing room, piecing together footage and realizing the host of the show failed to engage with the very people she was meant to be interviewing.
Compare this to Catherine, Princess of Wales. When Kate hosts an event or speaks with people, she listens, engages, and makes it about them. That is the essence of true royalty—shining a light on others rather than constantly redirecting it back to oneself. William and Kate understand that being royal is about service, not self-promotion. Even King Charles and Queen Camilla, despite their complicated past, fulfill their duties with dignity and purpose. Meanwhile, Harry sits beside Meghan like a ventriloquist’s dummy while she performs this bizarre one-woman act for the Netflix cameras. It’s heartbreaking to see how far he has fallen from the dedicated prince who once served his country and founded the Invictus Games. The Harry of today seems unrecognizable, reduced to nodding along and appearing increasingly uncomfortable.
It’s worth remembering that Meghan once claimed she knew nothing about the royal family before meeting Harry—that she even had to Google the national anthem. Yet now, she positions herself as an expert on royal protocol, British culture, and, apparently, television hosting. The contradictions are endless. This Netflix debacle is just another chapter in a familiar pattern. Since stepping back from royal duties, Meghan and Harry have insisted they wanted privacy and to escape media scrutiny. Yet, here they are, cameras documenting their every move, monetizing the very titles they claimed were so oppressive. The hypocrisy is infuriating, and judging by the reaction online, many people share that frustration. They left the UK to escape negative press, only to chase even more exposure—but on their terms, where they could attempt to control the narrative. The problem? The truth has a way of breaking through even the most carefully curated image, and the truth about With Love, Meghan is painfully clear: this show is not about sharing wisdom, connecting with guests, or even entertaining an audience. It exists for one reason—to keep Meghan in the spotlight at all costs.
Having worked in media, I can tell you that when a production team has to insert fake interview questions in post-production, something has gone terribly wrong. That’s not standard editing—it’s damage control. Netflix reportedly paid the Sussexes $100 million for their deal, yet the series only drew in 526,000 households in five days. The return on investment must be disastrous, and I can only imagine the uncomfortable discussions happening behind the scenes at Netflix headquarters.
What’s most disappointing is that this could have been something meaningful. Meghan has a platform most people could only dream of. She could use it to elevate important voices, highlight real issues, or create content that inspires and educates. Instead, we got a glorified vanity project—a drawn-out version of those cringeworthy Instagram reels where influencers pretend to be interviewing someone while really just talking about themselves. I can’t help but think back to the Harry who used to visit wounded veterans, play with children in Africa, and carry on his mother’s legacy with genuine warmth and humility. The difference between that man and the one we see now is devastating.
Before Meghan’s most devoted fans rush to attack, let’s be clear: this isn’t about blind hatred. It’s about calling out behavior that is blatantly self-serving and insincere. You cannot claim to value privacy while actively signing deals that broadcast your personal life for profit. At some point, the contradictions become impossible to ignore. So what’s next for them? More content about their supposed victimhood? More curated glimpses into their private lives? More projects where Meghan interviews people but makes it all about herself?
Meanwhile, Catherine is focusing on her recovery and her children, William is continuing his father’s environmental work while preparing for his future role, and King Charles—despite his own health challenges—carries on with his duties with grace. The missed opportunity here is what stings the most. Harry and Meghan could have been a powerful force for good. Instead, they have chosen to commercialize their grievances, producing content so poorly executed that it requires post-production trickery just to maintain the illusion of an actual interview.
So, what do you think? Am I being too harsh? Not harsh enough? Have you watched With Love, Meghan and noticed the awkward editing? Drop your thoughts in the comments—I read them all. If you’ve spotted other glaring examples of self-absorption in the series, let me know. I might just do a follow-up breakdown of the worst offenders. Thanks for letting me vent—it’s therapeutic for me, and I hope it’s entertaining for you. If you’ve made it this far, you’re my kind of royal watcher: observant, no-nonsense, and unwilling to be sold a fairy tale that doesn’t add up. Don’t forget to hit subscribe and turn on notifications so you don’t miss my next deep dive into royal drama. Until next time, keep your standards high and your BS detector higher.
