Meghan Markle is often enthusiastic about discussing her own experiences, particularly in the realm of female empowerment.
She passionately shares her insights on various platforms, relishing in conversations about shared struggles and triumphs. However, despite her openness on many topics, she has remained notably silent about her pregnancies and childbirth experiences.
This silence is perplexing to some, given her previous candidness, such as when she spoke about her experiences with toileting in Africa. One might wonder why she hasn't shared the nuances of pregnancy and the joyous moments of childbirth, including any advice or heartwarming anecdotes for fellow women, especially those experiencing what some might call a "geriatric birth."
Notably, a revelation surfaced from an insider source claiming that Meghan Markle's pregnancies and births might not have been as publicly documented as those of other royals. According to a friend working in the same hospital department, there is skepticism surrounding the authenticity of Archie's birth certificate.
Allegedly, Meghan was not registered in the hospital's maternity book, a standard record for all delivering women, regardless of social status. This raises questions about the lack of a traditional royal photo op outside the hospital, akin to those of Catherine and Princess Diana, which Meghan would have presumably embraced eagerly. It seems contradictory to her usual penchant for public representation and image cultivation.
In addition to this revelation, discrepancies in statements made by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have been highlighted in the media, adding fuel to the fire of speculation. During discussions about their daughter Lili's christening, a detail regarding the officiating clergy was inaccurately stated.
While the couple announced that Archbishop John Taylor conducted the ceremony, a TV host pointed out that he was referred to as the Bishop of Los Angeles, a factual inaccuracy that drew attention to the couple's attention to detail, or lack thereof. This discrepancy adds to the skepticism surrounding the Sussexes' narrative and their adherence to accuracy in public statements.
Furthermore, the timing and circumstances surrounding Lili's christening raise eyebrows within royal circles. Unlike Archie's christening at around two months old, Lili's ceremony occurred when she was nearly two years old, prompting speculation about the reasons behind the delay.
The absence of any royal family members at the christening further deepens the mystery, casting doubt on whether the ceremony adhered to traditional royal protocols. It's also unlikely that Lili wore the traditional royal gown, as suggested by a royal historian, further deviating from established royal customs.
