In 2020, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made the historic decision to step away from their royal duties, marking a significant departure from the traditional roles within the monarchy.
Now, according to insights from a royal author, there are intriguing claims circulating that suggest the couple entertains the idea of a potential return to the royal fold, albeit in a part-time capacity. This notion is seen as a strategic move to strengthen their brand, especially amidst the ongoing crisis. The discussions surrounding this possibility trace back to the Sandringham Summit, a pivotal gathering convened when news of Harry's departure from the royal institution, often referred to as "The Firm," came to light.
It's rumored that during this summit, the late Queen Elizabeth II left no room for ambiguity, making it abundantly clear to her grandson that there could be no half measures in his departure. This firm stance from the Queen prompted discussions regarding the feasibility of Harry and Meghan adopting part-time royal roles. Intriguingly, it's even reported that the Queen went to great lengths to ensure the privacy of these discussions, having the room checked for bugs to prevent any unauthorized leaks.
Royal author Tom Quinn sheds light on the couple's perspective, suggesting that they harbored a secret desire to eventually return to the fold. Quinn remarks that Meghan and Harry had long hoped for a shift in perspective within the royal family, particularly after the passing of Queen Elizabeth, anticipating that Prince Charles might adopt a more flexible approach to the definition of a working royal. Quinn emphasizes Meghan's potential enthusiasm for a part-time arrangement, envisioning alternating periods of six months in the UK fulfilling royal duties and six months in the United States, a strategy aimed at revitalizing the Sussex brand.
Reports suggest that King Charles, however, harbors reservations about Harry and Meghan's continued use of royal titles despite their step back from full-time royal duties. His preference for a streamlined monarchy complicates the prospects of a Sussex return to royal roles. Tom Quinn notes the sentiment among the American public, indicating a preference for Harry to retain his royal status, which added to his allure. However, the reluctance of King Charles to welcome Harry back as a working royal indicates a significant barrier to their return.
Despite Harry's recent gestures suggesting a willingness to engage with royal duties, such as his visit to the UK following his father's cancer diagnosis, insiders close to Charles maintain that the King remains steadfast in his position. While there might be communication between the King and Harry, the prospect of a temporary return seems unlikely, with the King unwilling to burden other family members with additional duties during his treatment.
Furthermore, the royal family appears resolute in upholding the decisions made during the Sandringham Summit, as reiterated by the late Queen's previous statements regarding the infeasibility of a half-in, half-out approach. Although Harry may be open to assisting if called upon by his father, the consensus within the royal family suggests that any return, even on a temporary basis, remains improbable.
