Lady C has accused Harry of perjury, alleging that a fabricated NYPD letter was presented to the British Court.
This official correspondence, sent in September, has ignited public outcry, with insiders corroborating claims that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry indeed falsified the NYPD letter. Subsequently, it was submitted to the UK High Court as part of a case concerning client security.
The letter from the NYPD, purportedly entered into a UK court case by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, asserts the potential for arrests stemming from a perilous Paparazzi chase in which they were embroiled last year. However, sources close to the matter informed The Post that there is insufficient evidence to press charges against anyone.
As a pivotal element in the decision to deny the prince state-funded security, the British Court referenced a formal letter from the NYPD to London's Metropolitan Police. This letter condemned the wild and persistently dangerous behavior of the Paparazzi during their pursuit of the Sussexes through Manhattan last May.
Despite claims of reckless behavior by the Paparazzi, investigations by both the NYPD and the Manhattan District Attorney's office have failed to produce any grounds for prosecution. While acknowledging reckless conduct by the Paparazzi, it was noted that Harry and Meghan's security team also contributed to the situation by not adhering to a proposed stop by the NYPD. Harry's insistence on someone being arrested lacks the necessary evidence, according to police sources.
The official letter, sent by the NYPD to the Metropolitan Police of London in September, was part of the London High Court's deliberation on a lawsuit initiated by Prince Harry against the British government. He demanded the reinstatement of tax-funded police protection in the UK, which was revoked after his departure from the royal family in 2020.
In addition to the initial letter, another document entered into the court filing, reportedly sent in error by Harry's lawyer, caused confusion by suggesting potential suspects had been identified. However, the High Court ultimately denied Harry the security he sought. The inclusion of the letter, despite its accidental submission, seemingly provided a glimmer of vindication for the Royals. However, any such vindication proved fleeting and could, in fact, exacerbate the ridicule faced by the couple for their involvement in the incident.
Amidst these developments, The Washington Post reported a lack of evidence to pursue anyone in the purported New York car chase. Lady C has now accused Harry of perjury, highlighting the potential legal ramifications in the UK for presenting a falsified document to court. Despite widespread suspicions surrounding the letter's authenticity, the likelihood of legal consequences for Harry remains uncertain.
In a recent poll of 3,500 individuals, a staggering 99% believe that Harry and Meghan fabricated the NYPD letter. Public sentiment reflects growing discontent, with users expressing frustration over perceived disrespect and privilege. The original narrative, implicating Harry's team in reckless driving, has intensified skepticism surrounding the entire ordeal, leaving many questioning the truth amidst the sea of allegations.
