Meghan Markle's confidant, Andy Cohen, found himself among a chorus of celebrities diving into the vortex of conspiracy theories swirling around Princess Katherine's recent absence from the limelight.
However, Cohen's subsequent apology, though belated, failed to quell the skepticism of Royal enthusiasts. The Mea culpa aired during the April 1st installment of "Andy Cohen Live" on Sirius XM, where he expressed regret: "I just want to say that I'm heartbroken by the news about Princess Catherine. I wish I'd kept my mouth shut." Despite his contrition, Cohen faced a barrage of criticism for his earlier remarks.
The talk show luminary faced intense backlash after initially opining on the rampant speculations surrounding the Duchess of Cambridge's retreat from public view. Though Cohen acknowledged the hiatus of his show as a reason for the delayed apology, many remained unappeased. One disgruntled commentator on X (formerly Twitter) dismissed Cohen's apology as insincere, urging him to reconsider his timing. Another echoed the sentiment, decrying the apology as "a little too late," emphasizing the importance of forethought before speech.
Cohen's involvement in perpetuating the conjecture surrounding Princess Katherine's absence extended beyond his radio show. He delved into the controversy on his podcast, "Daddy Dire," mere hours before the Duchess herself disclosed her medical ordeal. Cohen's resurfacing of sensational rumors further fueled the frenzy surrounding Katherine's hiatus, prompting widespread condemnation of his actions.
Meanwhile, amidst the tumult surrounding the Duchess's situation, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle faced criticism for purportedly turning a blind eye to the disparagement directed at Katherine by their supporters. Calls for the couple to disassociate from certain factions within their fan base intensified, with accusations of hypocrisy hurled at the Sussexes for their purported inaction.
In summary, Cohen's involvement in the speculation surrounding Princess Katherine's absence exemplifies the perils of celebrity commentary in the realm of royal affairs. The controversy serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the need for discretion and sensitivity when discussing sensitive matters concerning the royal family.
