Royal author Angela Levan raises the intriguing notion that the Invictus Games may be strategically shifting away from Prince Harry's central role.
In a discussion on GBN America, Levan points out that the event's heightened focus on royalty, especially with Harry and Meghan Markle's involvement, could signal a potential change in direction, possibly indicating their decreasing engagement. She wonders if this might be a subtle way to ease Harry out, noting that while she acknowledges Harry's positive contributions, the event seems to have become overly royal-centric.
She highlights Meghan's involvement in speeches and leading a march with ex-military personnel affected by war, expressing concerns about her unfamiliarity with military protocols and her appearances, which might distract from the event's core purpose of supporting wounded veterans. Levan emphasizes Harry's previous commendable interactions with participants, contrasted with what she perceives as Meghan overshadowing the event's focus.
Regarding the upcoming 10th anniversary service of the games, there's uncertainty about Harry's attendance. Security concerns have led to his cancellation of a return to England for the event, potentially causing the celebration to proceed without him. Reports suggest that Harry felt deeply offended by his eviction from Frogmore by King Charles after leaving the UK, adding to the complexities surrounding his involvement in events back home.
Turning to the broader significance of the Invictus Games, established in 2014 as an international multisport event for wounded veterans, the upcoming 10th-anniversary celebration at St Paul's Cathedral in London is significant. While Harry and Meghan are listed as guests, Harry's participation remains uncertain due to recent controversies and his relocation to the US. Security concerns may necessitate his participation online, reflecting ongoing tensions and uncertainties. The choice of St Paul's Cathedral as the venue aligns with Harry's preference for a solemn setting, though questions linger about ensuring his security at such a public location.
Opinions on Harry's role as the event's founder and his suitability as a representative diverge. Some argue for his continued involvement to maintain the event's spirit, while others suggest a transition to a new patron for long-term sustainability, given recent controversies and his perceived disconnect from royal duties. The uncertainty surrounding Harry's participation underscores broader questions about his role in the royal family and his evolving relationship with the public, highlighting the complexities that shape the future of the Invictus Games.
