Meghan Markle and Prince Harry concluded their Nigeria tour with a grand reception at a prestigious polo club on May 12th.
The day saw Meghan changing her wardrobe for the third time, elegantly clad in a beige summer outfit as she and Harry enjoyed a charity polo match. Notably, Meghan chose to go braless yet again, sparking curiosity about her preference in undergarments. This final outing took the royal couple to a polo field, a setting synonymous with wealth and privilege. However, questions arise about the sport's popularity compared to more common sports like football or soccer.
Despite claims of being a role model, Meghan's fashion choices, including her braless attire, appear deliberate. The couple attended a charitable event at a prestigious polo club, which, given its establishment in 1904, raises suspicions of corruption. As they settled into their seats, they seemed isolated, demonstrating a detachment from reality. While polo may hold significance for some, the lack of genuine interest from the involved individuals is perplexing.
Critics question the authenticity of Harry's supposed military service and his involvement in the Invictus Games, portraying the tour as more of a publicity stunt. Biographer Angela Levin expressed dismay over the couple's unofficial royal visit, labeling it as phony and awful. She criticized Meghan's outfit choice for a visit to the Lightweight Academy College, suggesting it lacked appropriateness.
Levin also accused Meghan of rudeness during a particular interaction on the Nigeria tour, claiming she prioritized getting good photos over engaging with teachers and students. Another royal expert accused the couple of exploiting their royal connections for personal gain, highlighting instances during events at the Nigerian defense headquarters that raised questions about their intentions.
At the reception, the couple's chairs were labeled with their titles, Duke and Duchess, instead of their first names, prompting criticism from royal expert Robert Jobson. He suggested they should embrace their individuality rather than clinging to their titles for currency. The discrepancy between Harry's actions, such as inspecting troops, and his stripped royal title further fueled skepticism about their motives, with commentators like Kinsey Scofield describing it as an attempt to monetize their connections.
