The Royal Collection Trust recently announced that their extensive archives do not contain any photographs of Archie and Lilibet, the children of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry.
This revelation has ignited a wave of speculation and controversy regarding the existence of the Sussexes' children. Currently, the Royal Collection Trust is hosting an exhibition at Buckingham Palace titled "Royal Portraits: A Century of Photography." The exhibition features previously unseen photos of various royal family members, including Queen Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret. However, the absence of images of Meghan Markle, Archie, and Lilibet has caught the attention of many visitors and royal watchers.
According to a report by the Mail on Sunday, the Trust has stated that they do not possess any photographs of Archie and Lilibet. This is particularly surprising given that the Royal Collection Trust holds millions of items in their archives. This disclosure has fueled conspiracy theories suggesting that Meghan Markle's children may not be real. The absence of these photographs has led to significant public debate and speculation. Some individuals are questioning the authenticity of Archie and Lilibet, suggesting that the lack of photographs in the Royal Collection Trust’s archives might indicate that the children do not exist. The Royal Collection Trust's statement has undoubtedly added fuel to the fire of these conspiracy theories.
The lack of photographs of Archie and Lilibet in the exhibition has been interpreted by some as evidence supporting the notion that the children may not exist. Meanwhile, a sensational rumor circulating on the Royal Saga YouTube channel has sent shockwaves through the royal family and captivated public attention. According to the channel, the British intelligence agency MI6 has purportedly concluded that Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor do not exist. The Royal Saga channel claims that MI6 found no concrete evidence to support the existence of Archie and Lilibet. It is alleged that birth certificates, hospital records, and photographs were subjected to forensic analysis and deemed fabricated. According to these rumors, the Sussexes orchestrated an elaborate hoax to maintain their relevance and secure lucrative business deals.
These rumors, if taken seriously, cast a shadow over the credibility of the Sussexes and raise questions about their character. Their pursuit of privacy while allegedly exploiting their royal connections for personal gain has long been a subject of public debate. The alleged fabrication of their children would represent a profound breach of public trust. If the rumors were true, the Sussexes could face significant legal consequences for creating false identities and disseminating misleading information. Such actions would have far-reaching legal and ethical implications, potentially resulting in legal repercussions.
As the world grapples with these astonishing rumors, attention shifts to the Sussexes and their potential response. Will they deny these allegations outright or will they offer an explanation? The coming days are expected to be filled with drama and intrigue as the scandal continues to unfold. Observers and royal watchers are keenly awaiting the couple's next move. Speculation abounds regarding the motivations behind such a brazen deception, assuming the rumors hold any truth. Financial gain could be a significant factor, as the Sussexes have secured lucrative deals with streaming giants and publishing houses that hinge on their public image as a modern royal family. The existence of their children is a key component of this narrative, making the alleged fabrication a strategic element of their public persona.
