Lady Colin Campbell, a familiar name to royal watchers, has once again sparked controversy with her latest book Meghan and Harry: The Real Story.
Known for her provocative commentary on the British Royal Family, Lady C delves into a particularly sensitive period in her latest release—Meghan Markle’s first pregnancy with Archie. Promising to reveal untold truths, the book paints a dramatic and controversial portrait of Meghan’s time behind palace walls, suggesting that her actions and behavior sharply contrasted with the carefully managed public image she and Prince Harry have presented.
According to Lady C, Meghan's pregnancy was far from the serene, royal affair often imagined. The book claims that the atmosphere within the palace was tense, with Meghan reportedly clashing frequently with royal aides. Lady C describes Meghan as defiant, unwilling to conform to traditional royal protocols, and resistant to guidance from palace staff. Her behavior, described as increasingly "diva-like," reportedly intensified during this period, as Meghan insisted on controlling her own narrative by hiring an independent PR team. This decision allegedly caused significant friction, as it was seen as a direct challenge to the long-standing royal machinery that typically handles public relations matters within the family.
One of the most provocative claims in Lady C’s book revolves around Meghan's tight control over access to her son, Archie. The narrative details how Meghan imposed strict limitations, dictating the terms under which senior royals, including the Queen, could see the baby. These actions were perceived as an assertion of control, further exacerbating tensions within the family. According to Lady C, palace staff saw Meghan’s behavior not merely as a breach of royal decorum, but as a significant liability. Concerns reportedly grew to the point where discussions emerged about possibly removing Meghan from her royal duties, as her actions were seen as posing a threat to the monarchy's reputation.
Additionally, Lady C disputes Meghan's often-repeated narrative of seeking privacy for her family. Instead, she suggests that Meghan’s actions were part of a larger strategy to redefine her role within the royal family. Far from being a passive victim of palace politics, Meghan is portrayed as someone actively shaping her public image and consolidating her influence. The book delves deeply into the internal conflicts and their impact on family dynamics, noting that while tensions appeared to ease somewhat after Meghan’s return from maternity leave, the damage had already been done. According to Lady C, this period of conflict left lasting scars on relationships within the family, permanently altering the Sussexes’ rapport with other royals in ways that continue to resonate today.
In stark contrast to the Sussexes’ narrative of victimhood and mistreatment by the royal institution, Lady C’s account presents a much more complex and self-serving portrayal of Meghan. The book positions her as a calculated figure, using her circumstances not merely to survive but to thrive within the system, doing so on her own terms. Lady C’s revelations are sure to ignite public debate, especially if Meghan or Harry decide to respond to these claims. The potential fallout could be explosive, adding yet another layer of controversy to an already tumultuous chapter in royal history. Should Meghan choose to address these allegations, it could reshape public perceptions of her role within the royal family and further complicate her already polarized image.
