Political commentator Meghan McCain recently launched a sharp critique of Meghan Markle's newest Netflix project, With Love, Meghan, describing it as a "toned-down vanity project."
As someone who has closely followed the drama surrounding the British Royal Family for years, even I found myself shaking my head in disbelief at this surprising turn of events. The trailer for With Love, Meghan paints an idyllic picture of the Duchess of Sussex's daily life. Scenes show her expertly baking pastries in an opulent, high-end kitchen, harvesting honey from her lavish backyard garden, and entertaining celebrity guests in a beautifully curated setting. However, these glamorous visuals have sparked outrage and criticism, particularly as millions of Americans grapple with rising living costs, inflation, and ongoing economic uncertainties.
The stark contrast between the show’s luxurious lifestyle content and the harsh financial realities faced by everyday families has not gone unnoticed. McCain, who once expressed support for Meghan Markle, pulled no punches in her critique. She called out the poor timing of the show's release, highlighting how many families are now forced to make difficult choices between heating their homes and putting food on the table. To McCain, With Love, Meghan feels like an ill-conceived attempt at emulating Martha Stewart, rather than a meaningful, impactful initiative.
The disparity between Markle’s Netflix venture and the tireless efforts of working Royals like Prince William and Princess Catherine is especially glaring. While the Princess of Wales dedicates her platform to initiatives that promote early childhood development, mental health advocacy, and family well-being, With Love, Meghan appears to present a polished, carefully manufactured version of perfection. It raises serious questions about the Sussexes' priorities, particularly given their reportedly lucrative $100 million Netflix deal. Critics argue that this project represents a missed opportunity to use their immense platform for the greater good.
Imagine the positive impact if a series like this had focused on tackling food insecurity, advocating for sustainable living, or uplifting underserved communities. Instead, viewers are treated to a showcase of indulgent luxury—an approach that feels tone-deaf and disconnected from the pressing challenges most people face.
The scrutiny doesn’t end with Meghan Markle. Prince Harry’s involvement—or rather, the perceived lack thereof—has also drawn criticism. Once admired for his hands-on charitable work and initiatives like the Invictus Games, Harry now appears relegated to a background role in his wife’s burgeoning lifestyle brand. Many observers lament how far he seems to have drifted from his previous image as a passionate advocate for real-world issues.
Public sentiment has been overwhelmingly critical. Social media platforms are awash with comments from viewers frustrated by what they see as the Sussexes' apparent focus on personal branding and self-promotion rather than substantive contributions to society. McCain’s blunt conclusion sums up a growing sentiment: "This is why people don’t like you."
In stark contrast, working members of the Royal Family—such as King Charles III, Queen Camilla, Prince William, and Princess Catherine—continue to prioritize public service. Their dedication to addressing climate change, championing social justice, and engaging in meaningful community outreach lends an authenticity to their efforts that resonates deeply with the public. Their actions reflect a genuine commitment to creating positive change, far removed from the glossy, highly curated world of With Love, Meghan.
As someone who has closely followed royal affairs for many years, I can’t help but feel a profound sense of disappointment at the Sussexes' current trajectory. Their unique position afforded them a powerful platform to amplify critical social issues and inspire real transformation. Instead, it seems they have chosen the path of unattainable luxury and superficiality—a path that leaves their potential to enact meaningful change sadly unfulfilled.
