Megyn Kelly has once again unleashed her sharp criticism, and this time her targets are none other than Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, often self-proclaimed advocates for compassion and humanitarian causes, have found themselves at the center of Kelly's scathing analysis on "The Megyn Kelly Show." Amidst the devastation caused by wildfires in Los Angeles, Harry and Meghan made an appearance—armed not with substantial aid but with a camera crew and a photo opportunity that Kelly didn’t hesitate to dismantle.
“Absolute cretins,” Kelly declared, lambasting the couple for what she saw as an attempt to use the wildfire tragedy to catapult themselves back into the spotlight. She criticized their actions as shallow and performative, suggesting their so-called relief efforts were more about media attention than meaningful charity. “What they need is support, not a publicity stunt,” Kelly continued, pointing out the disconnect between their publicized gestures and the genuine needs of wildfire victims.
The Sussexes were seen distributing food and comforting evacuees, but instead of winning public approval, they faced significant backlash. Kelly went as far as to label their actions "trauma porn," asserting that such behavior is part of a recurring pattern. She brought up Meghan’s controversial visit to Uvalde, Texas, following the school shooting in 2022, which she called another example of "disaster tourism." “This isn’t about helping others,” Kelly emphasized. “It’s about her image.”
Kelly had no shortage of suggestions for the couple, advising them to forego public spectacles in favor of quiet, meaningful contributions. “If they truly wanted to help, they could donate or support existing relief efforts,” she said. Instead, their actions have been widely criticized as one of the most brazen PR stunts to date. Critics accused Harry and Meghan of being out of touch and opportunistic, especially when compared to local celebrities who have been quietly volunteering and donating without drawing attention to themselves.
For many, the sight of Meghan Markle handing out bottled water while surrounded by cameras felt hollow and performative. Social media exploded with negative reactions, with one commenter remarking, “If I lost my home and Meghan Markle handed me a bottle of water, I’d be tempted to slap it out of her hand.” Others labeled the couple’s behavior persistently offensive and opportunistic.
Kelly also took aim at Prince Harry, delivering one of her most cutting remarks: “You’re in America now. We don’t care about you. You’re not our prince, you’ll never be king, and we hate your wife. Stay home.” Her blunt critique echoed the sentiments of many who view the couple’s approach as tone-deaf and self-serving.
The fallout from this controversy has been swift and severe. Hollywood’s elite, who often champion discreet philanthropy, reportedly feel unimpressed by the Sussexes' approach. The idea of turning a crisis into a PR moment has left many questioning whether the couple has any goodwill left among celebrities or the public at large.
As Harry and Meghan remain silent amidst the backlash, one thing is clear: their wildfire relief efforts have not had the desired effect. Instead of boosting their image, it has raised doubts about their intentions and damaged their already precarious reputation. The incident has sparked calls for the couple to rethink their strategy. If they continue on this path, their pursuit of relevance may ultimately result in alienation, burning bridges faster than the wildfires themselves.
