Meghan Markle and Prince Harry recently made a publicized appearance at an evacuation center, sparking discussions about their intentions and the manner of their charitable efforts.
Mayor Victor Gordo attempted to paint a heartwarming picture of the couple serving "anonymously" with masks on. However, a critical question arises: if this was a private act of service, why were cameras present, and why was a major news outlet like Fox News informed? In contrast, when Catherine, the Princess of Wales, visits charities or supports communities, there is no pre-announcement or media frenzy. Her approach is understated and sincere, allowing her work to speak for itself.
Comparing this to Meghan and Harry's heavily publicized outings, one notices a pattern: their so-called "private visits" somehow manage to dominate headlines, suggesting a strategic intent behind these appearances.
Take, for example, their appearance at the evacuation center. While their efforts might seem commendable at first glance, their actions were meticulously documented and disseminated. Meghan even staged a relatable moment of picking something off the ground, which felt more performative than genuine. Then came the announcement that they were opening their $4 million Montecito mansion to loved ones. The question is, who are these "loved ones"? Their relationships in California seem fraught, with many bridges reportedly burned.
Meanwhile, Prince William and Catherine continue to work quietly and effectively, upholding the dignity and grace expected of the monarchy. Whether visiting hospitals, meeting with communities, or supporting causes, their actions are not self-serving. In stark contrast, Meghan and Harry’s approach often feels like a publicity campaign. A particularly dubious moment was a hug Meghan shared with a crying woman who was later identified as being associated with Meghan’s team. Coincidence? Critics argue otherwise, calling it a textbook PR move.
This focus on image is disheartening when real tragedies are unfolding. Social media sleuths have pointed out inconsistencies in their narrative, noting how cameras and media were conveniently present. The mayor’s comments also revealed that the couple’s identities were initially unknown, raising further doubts about their authenticity. Supporters of the couple argue that they are private citizens and can act as they please, but the orchestrated nature of these events suggests otherwise.
There was a time when Prince Harry was celebrated for his charm, military service, and steadfast support of his brother. Now, many see him as a shadow of his former self, following Meghan’s lead in what appears to be a carefully scripted quest for attention. The announcement of their willingness to open their home during an emergency exemplifies this shift. Genuine altruism doesn’t require a press statement—it’s done quietly and without fanfare.
True philanthropy doesn’t seek the spotlight. It’s about the impact on those being helped, not the attention it brings to the helpers. Imagine how much more impressive it would have been if their assistance had been revealed weeks later through testimonials from those they aided. That’s the kind of service William and Catherine exemplify. They focus on meaningful work and maintain a sense of humility and grace, raising their children with the same values.
While Meghan and Harry pursue media opportunities under the guise of humanitarianism, the real heroes—firefighters, first responders, and everyday community members—are out there risking their lives. The stark contrast between the working royals and the Sussexes highlights the difference between genuine service and self-promotion.
To my dedicated audience who has followed my coverage of the royal family for years, I strive to be objective. However, there comes a time to call out what’s plainly visible. Meghan and Harry’s actions appear more about boosting their brand than genuinely helping others. Meanwhile, William and Catherine quietly set the standard for true royal service. They carry out their duties with dignity, raising their children responsibly, and continuing to represent the monarchy with unparalleled grace.
The takeaway is clear: if you want to help, just help. You don’t need cameras, staged moments, or press releases. True impact comes from action, not the applause that follows.
