Prominent figures who have consistently spoken out against the Sussexes have dismantled their latest attempt at rewriting history.
Just as the Princess of Wales, Catherine, courageously shared her personal health journey, the attention-seeking duo—Harry and Meghan—chose to promote their polo series. This blatant disregard for timing underscores their relentless pursuit of publicity. It’s a display of audacity that reaffirms what critics have said for years: their actions contradict their words at every turn.
As Piers Morgan aptly highlighted, a fundamental inconsistency lies at the core of Harry and Meghan’s behavior. They claim to desire privacy yet engage in actions that invite public scrutiny. For instance, Harry reportedly emailed People Magazine, one of America’s leading gossip outlets, to discuss his birthday plans. The hypocrisy is striking, akin to demanding privacy while granting exclusive interviews to tabloids. This isn’t merely another publicity stunt; it’s part of a broader pattern since their departure from royal duties.
Their original justification for leaving the royal fold revolved around a desire for privacy and a “normal life.” Yet, as Piers noted, they’ve instead monetized every facet of their royal connections, all while disparaging the institution that provided them with their titles. This contradiction has not only alienated them from the British public but also created a chasm within their own family. According to credible sources, nearly every member of the royal family now reportedly refrains from engaging with Harry and Meghan, fearing betrayal of private conversations. The mistrust among family members speaks volumes about the damage their actions have caused.
Furthermore, their repeated allegations of racism and safety concerns appear questionable when juxtaposed with Meghan’s international travels, including visits to Colombia and Nigeria, without incident. Such claims, critics argue, may be exaggerated to garner sympathy. Meghan’s frequent use of the term “my husband” when referring to Harry also draws attention. Observers have noted how this repeated phrasing seems like a constant reminder of her royal catch.
Meanwhile, the stark contrast between Harry and Meghan’s privileged life and the reality outside their California mansion cannot be ignored. While they reside in a $14 million estate, California grapples with pressing issues like homelessness, rising crime rates, and economic hardship. Yet, the couple’s focus remains on their own grievances. Their complaints about media coverage ring hollow when compared to the dignity and grace Catherine displays in the face of her challenges.
Piers’ revelation about the royal family’s current stance is significant. When he asserts that nearly every family member has distanced themselves from the Sussexes, it’s not idle gossip but a reflection of the widespread frustration with their actions. Their repeated betrayal of trust, monetization of private family moments, and relentless attacks on the monarchy have left little room for reconciliation.
Harry and Meghan’s continued use of their royal titles despite their criticisms of the monarchy further exposes their inconsistency. If they truly believed the institution to be oppressive or racist, relinquishing their titles would be the logical step. Instead, they cling to their titles while attempting to establish a rival “royal” presence in California.
Their latest publicity efforts, such as promoting a polo series amidst Catherine’s health revelations, exemplify their tone-deaf approach. While working royals focus on meaningful contributions, Harry and Meghan appear fixated on their own narratives. This self-centeredness extends to their children, who remain isolated from their royal heritage and extended family, growing up without the connections that once defined their lineage.
Finally, Meghan’s attempt to reframe her reputation as a difficult colleague during her royal tenure lacks credibility. The high staff turnover and consistent feedback from those who worked with her tell a different story. These patterns, coupled with their ongoing media appearances, reveal a couple more interested in maintaining relevance than addressing the challenges they claim to champion.
The stark contrast between the Sussexes and the working royals like William and Catherine is impossible to overlook. While the latter dedicate themselves to service and duty, Harry and Meghan continue to prioritize their own publicity. The public, once sympathetic to their plight, increasingly sees through their inconsistencies. Their diminishing credibility underscores the growing chasm between their rhetoric and reality.
