Meghan Markle reportedly believed Kate Middleton was overly eager to please, labeling her as too much of a "goody two-shoes." This critique, however, comes from someone who struggled to endure just 18 months of royal duties before retreating to California. The irony is undeniable.
Having followed Kate’s journey from the beginning—through her university days with Prince William, their courtship, marriage, and now her role as the future Queen—I see something entirely different. What Meghan dismisses as eagerness to please is actually a demonstration of respect, intelligence, and an understanding of duty.
These revelations highlight a fundamental difference between the two women. Kate took her time to learn, adapt, and respect an institution that has existed for over a thousand years. Meghan, on the other hand, approached it as though she were directing an episode of Suits, believing she could reshape centuries-old traditions overnight. A source even noted that Kate absorbs the atmosphere of a place before making judgments—an essential skill when stepping into an established institution. Yet, this approach was apparently too cautious for someone who thought she could revolutionize the monarchy in a matter of months.
Both women have faced criticism and gossip, but the contrast in their responses speaks volumes. Kate endured the scrutiny, learned from it, and grew stronger. Meanwhile, Meghan left, only to spend the next several years portraying herself as a victim on every available platform.
The idea that Meghan believed she knew better than an institution that has lasted for a millennium is astonishing. It’s akin to walking into NASA and insisting you know more about space travel simply because you’ve flown first class. The sheer arrogance of it is remarkable.
The timing of these resurfaced claims is also telling. While Kate is recovering from surgery with grace and dignity, these old remarks conveniently emerge. But when we compare their paths, it’s clear which approach has stood the test of time. The suggestion that Kate is the stronger of the two in many ways is absolutely accurate. Strength isn’t about making noise or demanding attention—it’s about patience, adaptability, and resilience.
Kate’s willingness to receive guidance from William and palace staff is another mark of her wisdom. That’s not weakness; that’s humility. It’s the recognition that those with decades of experience might actually have valuable insights. Yet, some misinterpret this as being “pushed around,” when in reality, it reflects an understanding that being part of the royal family means serving something greater than oneself—not prioritizing personal brand deals or the next Netflix contract.
The contrast between these two approaches is stark. One woman embraced the role, honored tradition, and worked within the system to effect change. The other, well—we all know how that unfolded.
Imagining the reaction in Montecito to all of this is amusing. As these revelations circulate, Meghan and Harry continue their struggle to remain relevant through their media ventures. The irony is undeniable.
At its core, this story isn’t just about two different approaches to royal life. It’s about the distinction between service and self-interest, humility and entitlement, understanding and defiance. And in the end, history will likely remember who truly embraced the responsibility of the Crown and who merely sought the spotlight.
