The Invictus Games, a Paralympic-style competition for wounded, injured, and sick servicemen and women, are designed to celebrate resilience, sportsmanship, and the inspiring spirit of those who have served their country.
However, the upcoming Invictus Games in Canada have been mired in controversy due to alleged extravagant demands from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. According to sources, the Sussexes submitted a list of requests that have sparked outrage among many Germans and veterans. These demands reportedly include private jets for themselves and their entourage, excessive security measures beyond protocol, and a team of stylists and personal chefs at their disposal.
Meghan Markle's increasing involvement in the event has fueled speculation about her motives, with whispers suggesting she might be using the Invictus Games as a platform to re-enter the spotlight. This controversy seems to center more on image management than on honoring veterans. Angela Levin, a distinguished journalist and Prince Harry's biographer, discussed the issue on GB News America with Mark Dolan. The TV presenter mentioned that around 2,000 ex-military personnel have left the games, reportedly feeling that the Invictus Games had lost their original meaning. Some veterans are even calling for Prince Harry to step down as the founder.
Levin believes the veterans' discontent may stem from Markle's increased involvement. According to Levin, the Invictus Games have become more about Meghan, with Harry seemingly following behind. This shift has not been well received by many, as the event appears to have become too royal. Levin recounted that Markle led a march involving veterans who were physically, emotionally, or psychologically damaged during their service. The veterans were upset by this, feeling that Markle, who lacks military experience, should not be leading such an activity.
Dolan asked Levin if the veterans felt the Invictus Games had turned into a public relations exercise for the Sussexes. Levin agreed, suggesting that the veterans feel neglected as Harry seems more focused on Meghan than on them. The veterans are also upset about the Sussexes’ preference for staying in the most expensive hotels, which they believe diverts funds from the cause.
Levin has previously claimed that Prince Harry's supporters are sorry and angry about Markle's takeover of the Invictus Games. She criticized the former actress for what she perceives as an extraordinary attitude of superiority. Markle's involvement, including giving multiple speeches and leading veterans, has been met with resistance, as many feel she lacks the necessary experience and understanding of military service.
Another royal expert warned that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle could face significant backlash if they do not conduct themselves appropriately at the Invictus Games. Clinical psychologist Dr. Sona Kapoor told The Mirror that mishandling the situation could add pressure, potentially leading to feelings of inadequacy or resentment. Success, Kapoor noted, requires open communication, mutual support, and ensuring that both partners have opportunities to pursue their interests and shine.
In summary, the controversy surrounding the upcoming Invictus Games highlights a significant tension between honoring the event's original purpose and the perceived image management by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle. The reaction from veterans and the public will likely shape the future direction and perception of this important event.
