Meghan Markle's utilization of her royal title to sway and coerce ordinary individuals has sparked considerable controversy, drawing responses from figures like General Christopher Musa.
Following their decision to step down from senior royal duties last year, Meghan and Prince Harry relocated to California with their children, Archie and Lilibet. However, one contentious issue persists: Meghan's continued use of her Royal Highness (HRH) title despite her non-active royal status.
Upon their departure from official royal roles, it was agreed that Harry and Meghan would cease using their HRH titles for professional endeavors. Nevertheless, they retain these titles technically. Many have voiced concerns that Meghan should abstain entirely from using HRH now that she's severed official ties with the royal family. Reports have emerged suggesting instances where Meghan has employed her HRH title in correspondence to exert pressure or influence over individuals and organizations.
An incident last fall involved Meghan reaching out to British MPs via email, advocating for paid parental leave. While signing off as The Duchess of Sussex, she included her HRH designation. This move stirred controversy as it blurred the line between political lobbying and official royal duties, potentially suggesting undue influence.
In another reported incident from last December, Meghan's lawyers allegedly sent threatening letters to an organization with which she had previously volunteered. These letters purportedly warned against publishing an old archive story about Meghan's volunteer work, citing potential damage to her reputation as an HRH and member of the British royal family. This perceived intimidation tactic has sparked outrage, with many arguing that Meghan has no rightful claim to the title or the implied authority it carries.
The response from General Christopher Musa, a decorated military veteran known for his staunch stance against oppression and bullying, has been particularly scathing. General Musa condemned Meghan's alleged behavior as "utterly deplorable" and "shameful," criticizing her for leveraging a royal title she no longer holds to intimidate community groups. He emphasized that such actions undermine democratic principles and set a dangerous precedent, calling for decisive measures to curb this behavior.
General Musa's rebuke resonates with many, underscoring the sentiment that individuals, regardless of their royal connections, should not exploit their titles to infringe upon the freedoms of others. He asserts that Meghan must either embrace her new private life or relinquish any notion of wielding official royal status for personal gain. Failure to do so, he warns, will necessitate firm action to uphold democratic values and prevent the wealthy and entitled from circumventing the law.
As the discourse surrounding Meghan's actions unfolds, General Musa's steadfast condemnation serves as a rallying point for those who believe in upholding democratic norms and safeguarding against abuses of power, regardless of one's social standing or former affiliations.
