Meghan Markle, once a television actress best known for her role on a cable drama, now finds herself at the center of ongoing controversy as she seemingly attempts to capitalize on a royal title she has shown little respect for from the beginning.
What’s infuriating is the sheer calculation behind her every move. Let’s rewind for a moment — this is the same woman who sat down with Oprah Winfrey to air grievances and make explosive claims against the Royal Family, allegations that sowed division and hurt countless hearts. Despite claiming she felt trapped by royal life, she now clings to her duchess title as though her very career depends on it. The contradiction is glaring.
Then there’s Prince Harry. Remember the Harry we all adored? The charming, mischievous prince who brought joy wherever he went and proudly served his country in the military? Today, he seems a shadow of his former self — following Meghan’s lead, repeating scripted lines, and attacking the very family that shaped his identity. It’s heartbreaking to witness.
And now, here comes the next chapter: Meghan’s Instagram comeback under the name "Duchess of Sussex." The irony couldn’t be more apparent. For someone who claimed royal life was stifling and toxic, she’s remarkably keen on leveraging her royal connection whenever it suits her ambitions. It’s like watching someone who quits their job in a grand spectacle, only to continue flaunting the company uniform to remain relevant.
Timing is everything. With her Netflix contract nearing its end and her other ventures like the American Riviera brand struggling to gain traction, it’s no coincidence that she’s back to basking in royal limelight. This is Meghan’s modus operandi: when the spotlight dims, she dusts off the royal card to reclaim attention. In sharp contrast, Prince William and Princess Catherine remain steady pillars of duty and service, setting an example of true royal grace while Meghan indulges in princess fantasies.
Consider King Charles, who has displayed patience and restraint despite relentless attacks from his youngest son and daughter-in-law. The British public’s growing frustration has manifested in petitions calling for the removal of Harry and Meghan’s titles. These sentiments aren’t baseless; they reflect a collective exhaustion with seeing the monarchy used as a personal marketing tool.
Meghan’s claim that she didn’t know much about Prince Harry before meeting him strains credulity — especially considering her past photos posing outside Buckingham Palace as a tourist. Her supposed ignorance of royal protocol didn’t prevent her from orchestrating one of the most dramatic royal exits since the abdication crisis. Her approach is a masterclass in contradiction: condemning the monarchy while profiting from its prestige, signing off as "Meghan" when it suits her but flashing her duchess title when it offers an advantage.
The accusations Meghan leveled against the monarchy, particularly those concerning racism, inflicted profound damage on an institution working to evolve. Yet, these claims came with no substantive evidence — only vague assertions and sensational interviews, including one aired during Prince Philip’s hospitalization.
Even minor stories became fuel for public drama. Take the infamous pre-wedding tale of Meghan crying over a bridesmaid dress fitting. Later reports suggested it was actually Princess Catherine who had been left in tears. The pattern is familiar: generate drama, position oneself as the victim, and capitalize on the chaos.
Prince Harry’s transformation is perhaps the most tragic. Once a beacon of warmth and humor, he now seems weighed down by discontent. His recent grievances — claiming no effort was made by his family to reconcile — clash with repeated gestures of goodwill, from invitations to royal celebrations to his grandmother’s funeral. His narrative feels like gaslighting.
Let’s not overlook the HRH title controversy. After stepping back from royal duties, Harry and Meghan agreed not to use it. Yet here she is, testing boundaries again. It’s reminiscent of a teenager pushing limits — except Meghan is a grown woman who should know better.
Her brand of feminism rings hollow. Preaching women’s empowerment while clinging to a title derived solely from marriage to a prince smacks of hypocrisy. True empowerment requires authenticity, not trading on borrowed prestige.
The toll of these actions is not limited to personal reputation; it affects the working royals, who carry out their duties with quiet dignity. While Prince William and Princess Catherine tirelessly support charitable causes and raise their children with a sense of service, Harry and Meghan seem more focused on tell-all books and media deals. Privacy? The irony is stark.
Princess Catherine, despite enduring barbs and veiled insults, exemplifies poise and grace. She represents what it means to embrace royal responsibility with humility and dedication, a sharp contrast to Meghan’s approach of treating the institution as a stepping stone to celebrity.
What’s most troubling is how Meghan’s supporters frame all criticism as rooted in racism or bullying, effectively silencing valid concerns. Her behavior, inconsistencies, and reported mistreatment of staff merit scrutiny. Yet, these narratives are often dismissed, buried under claims of bias.
As the Netflix and Spotify deals falter and her ventures falter, Meghan’s reappearance on social media reeks of desperation. The public, however, sees through the charade. Petitions demanding title removal are gaining traction because people are weary of this exploitation of royal ties.
The monarchy, though imperfect, stands as a symbol of continuity and service. Prince William and Princess Catherine embody its future with dignity and compassion, while King Charles remains a figure of resilience. Harry and Meghan’s legacy, however, appears to be one of broken relationships and relentless self-promotion.
Princess Diana, who inspired Harry’s passion for humanitarian work, used her platform to create real change, not as a springboard for fame. Harry, once poised to bridge tradition and modernity, now seems adrift.
Ultimately, it’s the children who will bear the consequences of these choices. William and Catherine’s kids will grow up aware of the family rift. Archie and Lilibet may inherit a narrative of bitterness and estrangement.
Yet, hope endures. The steadfastness of the working royals and the enduring strength of the monarchy provide reassurance. Public discontent, as reflected in the petitions, is a call for accountability. Being royal is not about fame — it’s about service, sacrifice, and a commitment to something greater than oneself.
Meghan’s actions suggest a different agenda. Perhaps it’s time to reconsider the privilege of her titles. After all, respect for an institution should be a prerequisite for its honors.
