Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are reportedly struggling with an increasingly tarnished public image, leading to mounting scrutiny and speculation about their professional and personal dealings.
The couple, once celebrated for their departure from royal life to forge an independent path, now finds themselves at the center of controversy, with their working relationships and leadership styles being called into question. Renowned royal biographer and author Hugo Vickers has weighed in on the matter, offering a critical perspective on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Writing for The Mail on Sunday, Vickers pointed out that the recent dispute involving Sentebale, Prince Harry’s longstanding charity, has further reinforced concerns about the couple’s management style. He noted that this situation mirrors previous instances where their approach to leadership and employment has raised eyebrows.
Drawing from past examples, Vickers recalled the couple’s history of staff resignations, which date back to their time at Frogmore Cottage, through their various professional endeavors, including the Archewell Foundation and Meghan’s business ventures. The pattern suggests a challenging work environment, with high turnover among those employed by the Sussexes. This, he argued, starkly contrasts with the working dynamic of senior royals, who benefit from a well-established support system and advisors to help navigate complex situations.
Vickers further referenced the bullying allegations that have surfaced against Meghan, emphasizing how workplace tensions can escalate under pressure. While things may run smoothly when circumstances are favorable, setbacks and crises appear to create an environment where stress levels rise, tempers flare, and professional relationships deteriorate. This, he suggested, has contributed to the growing perception that Harry and Meghan are difficult to work with.
The recent fallout with Sentebale has only reinforced existing doubts about their professional conduct, adding to the perception that they are struggling to maintain positive relationships within their charitable and business ventures. According to Vickers, the Sussex brand has now become significantly tainted—if it wasn’t already. This was highlighted when Dr. Sophie Chandauka, the chair of Sentebale, declined a request from Prince Harry’s team to publicly defend Meghan against negative press coverage. Her decision to distance herself from the controversy suggests an awareness of the reputational risks associated with aligning too closely with the Sussexes at a time when their public image continues to face challenges.
As the couple navigates this difficult phase, questions linger about their ability to sustain their independent pursuits without the institutional support they once had within the royal family. Their efforts to redefine themselves outside the monarchy now appear increasingly fraught with obstacles, leaving them in a precarious position as they attempt to move forward.
