A Michelin-starred chef has reportedly found himself in the crosshairs of Meghan Markle after voicing his opinion about her Netflix project, "Love, Meghan."
Now, he claims to have received hundreds of death threats as a result. Jameson Stocks recently appeared on GB News, where he revealed that he was approached during New York Fashion Week last year to consult on what was described as a "mystery lifestyle program." However, Stocks quickly declined the offer, stating that it simply wasn’t for him.
It’s quite revealing that a highly respected chef wanted nothing to do with this project before even knowing all the details. His instincts seemed to warn him that this would become a public relations disaster. Even more intriguing is his claim that a Netflix representative subtly hinted at the divisive nature of their star. They were well aware of what they were getting into and, in essence, cautioned him that working with Meghan Markle could be a professional minefield. If that doesn’t say something about how she is perceived within the industry, what does?
Stocks made it clear that his decision to decline the project was purely a matter of professional self-preservation. Even if the show turned out to be a great production—though he was skeptical of that possibility—he feared being criticized simply for his association with Markle. That speaks volumes. The idea that merely being linked to her could harm his reputation raises serious questions about how she is viewed in professional circles.
Going even further, Stocks admitted he disliked the idea of teaching her something only for it to appear staged and inauthentic. His concerns were not unfounded. Looking at the final product, his predictions were spot on. The Netflix show attempted to shape Meghan into a lifestyle guru in the mold of Martha Stewart, but the forced delivery and contrived scenarios made it painfully obvious that this was more about image control than authenticity.
Netflix, however, has denied ever approaching Stocks, insisting that the show wasn’t even in development at the time he claims the meeting took place. But that raises another question—why would he make up such a specific story? Stocks has nothing to gain from fabricating this. As an established chef with an impeccable reputation, speaking out against someone as controversial as Meghan Markle isn’t exactly a strategic career move. If anything, the backlash he has faced only proves how risky it is to criticize her.
Since sharing his experience, Stocks claims to have received hundreds of death threats. Let’s pause for a moment—hundreds of threats against a man simply for expressing his honest opinion about a television project. That is beyond unacceptable. Now, let’s contrast this with how Catherine, Princess of Wales, handles criticism. Have you ever heard of someone receiving death threats for critiquing one of her initiatives? Of course not. That’s because Catherine conducts herself with grace and dignity, understanding that public figures must accept both praise and criticism. More importantly, she doesn’t mobilize an army of social media supporters to attack those with differing views.
Think back to when Catherine launched her early years initiative. There was skepticism, but did she lash out at her critics? No. She let her work speak for itself, earning respect through genuine dedication. That is the mark of true royalty. The same can be said for King Charles and Queen Camilla, who have endured decades of scrutiny but never resorted to intimidation tactics. They understand that leadership requires resilience and composure.
The irony is glaring—Meghan and Harry left the UK citing media harassment as a key reason, yet now anyone who criticizes them faces relentless backlash. The free speech they demand for themselves does not seem to extend to those who disagree with them. This isn’t the first time professionals have been hesitant to work with them, either. Recall the high staff turnover in the Sussex household. There is a clear pattern—people walk away because they recognize the warning signs.
Stocks’ experience highlights a troubling culture of intimidation surrounding Meghan and Harry. They claim to advocate for mental health, yet where is their condemnation of these threats? Their silence speaks volumes. Meanwhile, the working royals—William, Catherine, Charles, and Camilla—continue to embody true service. They don’t need to silence critics because their actions speak louder than words.
King Charles remains devoted to his duty despite recent health challenges. Queen Camilla, once vilified, has won the public’s respect through hard work and sincerity. They don’t engage in petty PR battles; they simply get on with their responsibilities. It raises the question—what could Harry and Meghan achieve if they focused on substance rather than perception? Instead of attempting to control the narrative, they could concentrate on meaningful accomplishments. Unfortunately, they seem more invested in controversy than legacy.
Looking ahead, one can only hope that Jameson Stocks remains safe and continues to speak his truth. Netflix and the Sussexes should address these serious allegations rather than dismiss them. More importantly, this situation should serve as a wake-up call about the toxic environment surrounding them. For those who support the working royals, let’s keep our attention on their positive contributions. William, Catherine, Charles, and Camilla don’t require an online army to defend them—their dedication and service speak for themselves.
