The ongoing friction between Meghan Markle and the British royal family has taken another interesting turn, this time involving Princess Eugenie.
Though she never mentioned Meghan by name, Eugenie's recent comments on Cresida Bonas' podcast were widely interpreted as a subtle critique of Meghan’s carefully managed public persona. Her remarks have reignited discussions about Meghan’s authenticity, ambition, and her lasting influence on royal history. Unlike Meghan, who made a dramatic exit from the royal family, Eugenie has managed to maintain her close ties with the monarchy despite occasionally defying tradition. The contrast between them is striking—one has chosen to navigate royal life with a sense of balance, while the other severed ties in a highly publicized manner.
Eugenie’s latest remarks have only strengthened this perception. Speaking openly during the podcast, she praised individuals who remain genuine despite external pressures and highlighted the importance of not leveraging personal connections for self-promotion. While she never directly referenced Meghan, the implication was difficult to ignore.
Royal observers were quick to interpret Eugenie’s words as a discreet but pointed critique of Meghan, who transitioned from a relatively unknown actress to a duchess and later a public figure monetizing her royal status. This transformation has been met with ongoing scrutiny, and Eugenie’s statements carry even more weight considering their past rapport. Initially, the two appeared to share a friendly dynamic, but sources later suggested that Eugenie became wary of Meghan’s true motives. A key turning point was the Sussexes’ bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey, in which Meghan and Harry publicly criticized the royal family. That interview reportedly strained many royal relationships, including Eugenie’s, as she has managed to step away from the monarchy without burning bridges.
Adding another layer to this discussion is the podcast’s host, Cresida Bonas, who was once Prince Harry’s girlfriend and considered a potential royal bride. Unlike Meghan, Cresida chose to step away from both the relationship and royal life without controversy. She built a successful career on her own terms and never sought to capitalize on her past with Harry. This contrast only strengthens the argument that Meghan’s portrayal of herself as a victim of the monarchy does not hold up when compared to others who have distanced themselves from royal life in a far more dignified manner.
Eugenie’s remarks, while carefully worded, have had a significant impact. They serve as a reminder that it is possible to leave royal life without creating controversy, and for many royal watchers, this development reinforces long-standing suspicions about Meghan’s approach to both the monarchy and her public image. One thing remains clear—Meghan’s self-constructed narrative continues to face challenges from those who are most familiar with the inner workings of the royal world.
