After Charles III evicted them from Frogmore Cottage, the British media returned to the topic after the circulation of versions that would confirm that the monarch was obliged to provide shelter for his son, by an ancient decree.
After his much-discussed passage through the United Kingdom alone, Prince Harry once again hit the front pages due to a controversial decree that would have quite obfuscated the people who no longer understand the place that the Duke has in the monarchy after the contempt that he managed with his family.
As reported by The Sunday Times, Charles III would be obliged, by law, to grant his son a residence every time he is on British soil. The reason? Harry still holds the position of State Councilor, and, by decree, all those who occupy this role must have an official residence in the United Kingdom.
This role is only intended for members of the Windsor family who can replace the monarch in case he is traveling abroad or is indisposed due to health problems.
It should be remembered that Harry and Meghan Markle had to vacate Frogmore Cottage, the residence they maintained in London, to reduce unnecessary expenses for the royal family. After the departure of the Sussexes, the property remained in the hands of Prince Andrew, another source for the British monarchy.
By losing the residence he had, it was assumed that the prince would no longer be eligible to be one of the King's councilors of state, but, to the surprise of the people, this was not the case; Therefore, controversy broke out throughout the territory about Harry's role for the monarchy and the expenses that his presence in the country would bring to taxpayers.
Regarding the Duke's last visit to the United Kingdom, The Sunday Telegraph learned that he requested a room at Windsor Castle to spend the night, but the request was denied by the Palace after the request did not arrive in sufficient time. anticipation. Thus, he would have paid for his stay in the country himself, without incurring expenses for the State.
