The Daily Mail broke the news about Nacho Figueras posting about Meghan Markle's jam just hours before Trooping the Colour.
The timing of Nacho's post raises eyebrows and invites speculation about its purpose. Considering that the Daily Mail is known to have connections with a WhatsApp group involving the Sussexes and the press, it begs the question: who leaked the information right before Trooping the Colour? Nacho himself doesn't have a massive following that could cause a post to go viral independently. Therefore, it's apparent that someone tipped off the newspaper.
The images clearly show broad daylight, indicating they weren't taken in the early morning, as one might assume. Among them are a jar of jam, a slender white dog, and a container of dog treats. The final picture features a quote: "Good things come to those who believe, better things come to those who are patient, and the best things come to those who don't give up." Nacho's open support for Meghan and Harry suggests he's influenced by the narrative against the royal family.
But why would Nacho align himself with this narrative? It's likely because he cares for Harry and believes his version of events, leading him to support what might be seen as a petty gesture. Meghan and Harry may have shared stories with him about feeling wronged by the royal family, which has shaped his perspective.
Now let's delve into the jam. Raspberry jam typically contains visible seeds, yet the jar in Nacho's post resembles the strawberry jam that Meghan previously distributed, albeit with a new label. The label appears haphazardly affixed, hinting at a rushed effort. The choice of raspberries and the timing of the post seem calculated to convey a hidden message. Could the reason for the hastily applied label and the "two of two" designation be that Nacho received extra labels? Peel off the first one, stick on the second, and you have new but still red jam. Meghan might have been scrambling for something to share after Princess Catherine's announcement, which could explain the post's hastily assembled appearance.
Examining the pictures again, the placement of a dog next to the jam raises questions. In the U.S., "biscuit" can be slang for a side piece, while a dog can symbolize a disreputable person. This could be interpreted as a subtle dig at Catherine, implying something negative about her marriage. Meghan has a history of embedding hidden messages in social media posts, such as wearing Harry's bracelet before the relationship was public. These subtle cues are part of her manipulative strategy.
Putting it all together, Meghan's posts appear to be a spiteful attempt to overshadow Trooping the Colour and subtly insult Catherine. The jar labeled "two of two" could imply infidelity, a rumor Meghan's supporters have propagated for years. This PR move showcases Meghan's petty and vindictive side. Despite potential backlash, Meghan can maintain plausible deniability, shifting blame onto the British media for misunderstanding her intentions. In the end, Meghan's actions reflect poorly on her and those who support her, including Nacho. Meanwhile, Catherine remains poised and graceful, which may only serve to further frustrate Meghan.
