Prince Harry has potentially jeopardized his wife Meghan Markle's royal titles following a startling admission in a newly released documentary.
Harry disclosed that he would never bring Meghan back to the UK due to security concerns, sparking fears among royal experts about Meghan's titles. Additionally, there have been claims that Meghan's potential political career could cause significant issues for the royal family. Royal commentator Natasha Livingston noted that Meghan retaining her Duchess of Sussex title while engaging in politics would be problematic for the traditionally non-political royals.
Rumors suggest Meghan might change her career aspirations following President Joe Biden's decision to end his re-election campaign and endorse Vice President Kamala Harris as the Democratic candidate. In an interview with Palace Confidential, Livingston emphasized that maintaining a royal title while holding a political office would be a major issue for the royal family. She explained that the non-political nature of the royals could be compromised, causing substantial complications.
This situation follows Prince Harry's recent confession that he would never bring Meghan back to the UK due to the ongoing danger posed by British tabloids. During the ITV documentary "Tabloids on Trial," Harry expressed his concern that his legal battles with the tabloids only attract more attention. He highlighted the persistent danger, noting that all it takes is one person to act on what they read, using a knife or acid, which is a genuine concern for him. This is one of the main reasons he refuses to bring Meghan back to the UK.
In a recent national TV interview, Prince Harry made a controversial statement claiming Meghan Markle would not return to the UK due to fears of violent attacks, such as being attacked with a knife or acid. This assertion has sparked widespread attention and debate. Critics argue that Harry's concerns are exaggerated and serve to gain sympathy and bolster their case for taxpayer-funded security in the UK. Despite Harry's claims, there have been no recorded incidents of such attacks against the couple during their visits to the UK post-Megxit.
This discrepancy has led some commentators to suggest that Harry's statements are more about manipulating public perception than addressing real threats. Social media user @RoyalSage commented that the couple's fears are a tactic to manipulate their security case. Despite these fears, Harry and Meghan have traveled to countries with higher safety risks, such as Nigeria, further fueling the controversy. Critics argue that the negative stories about Harry and Meghan are largely self-inflicted, stemming from their public statements and behavior.
According to Royal News Network, Harry's attempt to equate phone hacking with critical stories about Meghan is seen as an effort to rewrite the narrative and avoid accountability for their actions. The negative press they receive is viewed as a consequence of their own actions rather than any illegal information gathering by the media.
