In recent weeks, speculation has intensified regarding the potential removal of Prince Harry and his children, Archie and Lilibet, from the British line of succession.
These rumors have sparked considerable debate both within royal circles and among the public, prompting many to question whether the Duke of Sussex's place in the royal hierarchy remains secure. Once a beloved figure both in the UK and internationally, Prince Harry's reputation has taken a significant hit in recent years. His previous role as a senior royal, characterized by prestigious state banquets and widespread public adoration, has been overshadowed by mounting criticism and estrangement from his family.
Much of this tension has been fueled by Harry's memoir, "Spare," in which he controversially detailed his strained relationship with his father, King Charles, and even alluded to a fleeting desire to cause him harm. These revelations have intensified the debate over whether Harry should retain his place in the line of succession.
The discussion extends beyond Harry to his children, Archie and Lilibet, who are currently sixth and seventh in line to the throne, respectively. Their permanent residence outside the UK and Harry's cessation of royal duties have led to growing calls for a reassessment of their positions. Critics argue that if Harry himself is deemed unfit to hold his place in the succession line, his children, lacking significant ties to the British royal family, should also be removed.
Reports suggest that discussions on this matter are currently taking place at Balmoral, where the royal family is gathered. These discussions are rumored to include the possibility of stripping Harry, Meghan, and their children of their titles and positions. Although speculative, such discussions have historical precedent. The line of succession has been altered in the past due to various circumstances, including when individuals have moved abroad or ceased to fulfill royal duties.
Constitutional experts have weighed in, noting that while residing abroad does not automatically disqualify someone from the line of succession, it can be grounds for removal if accompanied by a failure to meet royal obligations. Professor Robert Blackburn of King's College London has highlighted that changes to the line of succession can be enacted by statute, allowing Parliament to legally remove Harry and his children if deemed necessary. This legal pathway has been used before, adding weight to the current discussions at Balmoral.
Despite these considerations, some believe that any decision to remove Harry and his children from the line of succession is unlikely to occur under King Charles III. The king, reportedly dealing with health issues, may lack the resolve to undertake such a drastic action. Instead, many speculate that the responsibility could fall to Prince William upon his ascension to the throne. Prince William, who has reportedly severed ties with Harry, may be less inclined to tolerate his brother's actions and could take decisive steps to exclude Harry and his family from the royal fold.
The debate over the potential removal of Prince Harry and his children from the line of succession remains a topic of intense scrutiny. Whether constitutional law will support such a move, and whether it will occur under King Charles III or be deferred to Prince William, remains uncertain. What is clear is that the royal family faces growing pressure to address the issue, and any decision made will have significant and lasting implications for the future of the monarchy.
