The fairy tale surrounding Meghan Markle's pregnancy with Lilibet, initially intended to mend a fractured nation, is now under intense scrutiny.
Royal commentator Neil Schwan has made shocking claims suggesting that Meghan might not have been pregnant at all. If true, this could become one of the most significant royal scandals of the century, potentially shaking the very foundation of the Sussexes' meticulously crafted public image.
Neil Schwan, known for his deep knowledge of the royal family, has presented a series of compelling arguments supporting his controversial theory. One of the most striking pieces of evidence he cites is the absence of visible physical changes in Meghan during the advanced stages of what was supposed to be her pregnancy. While it's not uncommon for celebrities to conceal pregnancy bumps, the lack of any discernible alterations in Meghan's physique throughout the entire gestation period has raised eyebrows among royal watchers and fashion experts alike.
Furthermore, Schwan highlights inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding Lilibet's birth. The decision to give birth in a private California hospital rather than a London maternity ward has been questioned by some, suggesting it may have been a deliberate attempt to avoid scrutiny. The lack of public appearances by Meghan during the latter stages of the pregnancy, combined with the absence of traditional royal baby photographs, has only fueled further speculation about the authenticity of the pregnancy.
Perhaps the most damning evidence comes from body language experts who have analyzed Meghan's behavior during the supposed pregnancy. These experts have identified several cues suggesting that she may have been faking the condition, including the way Meghan held her stomach and the absence of certain physical changes typically associated with pregnancy.
If Schwan's claims are substantiated, the implications for the Sussexes could be catastrophic. Not only would it shatter their carefully cultivated image as a modern and progressive royal couple, but it would also raise serious questions about their credibility and trustworthiness. The public's faith in the monarchy has already been eroded by recent events, and this scandal could potentially deliver the final blow.
Angela Levin, a royal expert and vocal critic of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, has expressed her views following the Sussexes' revelation about their fears as parents to Archie and Lilibet. In a recent TV appearance, Meghan discussed the dangers of online content and stated, "Our kids are young—they're three and five—but all you want to do as parents is protect them. As we can see what's happening in the online space, we know there's a lot of work to be done, and we're just happy to be able to be a part of the change for good." Prince Harry added, "At this point, every parent needs to be a first responder. Even the best first responder in the world wouldn’t be able to spot the signs of possible suicide. That's the terrifying part of all of this."
Angela Levin, upon viewing a clip of Meghan and Harry's interview on CBS Sunday Morning, tweeted, "This is beyond weird. Meghan wants to protect the kids from what's happening online, and Harry thinks all parents should be first responders to try to stop signs of suicide."
As this story unfolds, it's clear that the truth about Meghan's pregnancy is far more complex than it initially appeared. It's essential to approach these claims with caution, as the burden of proof lies with those making the allegations. However, the evidence presented by Neil Schwan is certainly compelling and raises serious questions about the veracity of the Duchess's claims. The public deserves to know the truth, and it is imperative that a thorough investigation be conducted to clear the air.
