Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have reignited speculation about their ties to the World Economic Forum (WEF) with their recent activities, particularly their visit to Colombia.
This visit has sparked accusations that they might be acting as pawns for the global elite. According to a tweet from the Colombian embassy, their trip was framed as a socially inclusive initiative aimed at enhancing collaborative projects between Vice Colombia, Mini Guav Colombia, and the Archewell Foundation. The primary goal of this visit was purportedly the financial empowerment of youth and women—a term that raises concerns for those familiar with the WEF's agenda.
The WEF has long advocated for digital inclusion and financial empowerment, often through initiatives that promote digital ID systems and data sharing among financial institutions. This emphasis on financial inclusion, especially for women, is a recurring theme in WEF strategies. Critics argue that these initiatives are less about genuine empowerment and more about extending financial control and surveillance. The scrutiny is intensified by the observation that Harry and Meghan's travels often follow WEF events. For instance, their visit to Nigeria occurred shortly after a major WEF event in that country, and their recent visit to Colombia coincided with WEF discussions on financial inclusion and digital strategies.
There is now speculation that their upcoming visit to India might further align with the WEF’s agenda if it occurs as expected. In Colombia, the initiative endorsed by the WEF includes the development of a new low-value interoperable fast payment system set to launch in May 2025. Spearheaded by Colombia’s Central Bank in collaboration with the private sector, this system emphasizes co-creation, interoperability, efficiency, inclusion, and innovation. Critics argue that such systems, while presented as inclusive, often lead to increased financial control and taxation, with inclusion serving as a guise for more intrusive financial mechanisms.
The broader concern is that Harry and Meghan are becoming instruments of the WEF's agenda, using their high profile to advance initiatives seen by many as part of a broader strategy for financial control and surveillance. The narrative of financial empowerment and inclusion is perceived by some as a facade for more invasive and exploitative practices. This connection raises serious questions about the role of celebrities and royals in promoting the WEF’s objectives. The idea that Harry and Meghan might be acting as mere puppets for the WEF not only casts doubt on their genuine commitment to social causes but also highlights a troubling trend of high-profile figures serving the interests of powerful global institutions.
The situation is further complicated by the perception that these initiatives are part of a larger agenda led by figures such as King Charles, who is also linked to the WEF. This connection suggests a coordinated effort to reshape global financial systems under the guise of inclusivity and empowerment. As scrutiny continues, it is clear that the role of high-profile figures in advancing global financial agendas is an issue of growing concern.
