Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's recent visit to Colombia, branded as a "Royal tour," has stirred considerable debate regarding the sincerity of their public displays of affection.
Having stepped down from their official royal duties in 2020, the couple appears eager to maintain an aura of royal grandeur. Their trip commenced with a breakfast meeting alongside Colombia's Vice President, Francia Márquez, and her husband, Raphael Yapo, in Bogotá. Meghan's attire for the occasion—a $598 Orindé vest by designer Veronica Beard—was predictably extravagant.
Prince Harry, dressed in a tailored navy suit, played the part of the attentive husband, showcasing his protective nature by placing a reassuring arm around Meghan. However, their public interaction did not go unnoticed, raising eyebrows and sparking conversations.
Lip-reading expert Nicola Hickling highlighted a notable exchange between the couple as they exited a building. According to Hickling, Meghan whispered a command to Harry, simply stating, "Hand," to which Harry immediately responded, "Here you go." This brief interaction almost seemed orchestrated, reinforcing suspicions that their public displays may be more of a performance than a genuine reflection of their relationship.
Meghan’s seemingly calculated command, "Hand," resonates with what a parent might instruct a child to do, possibly suggesting that Harry has been relegated to a compliant role under Meghan's vigilant gaze. This incident raises questions: Is Harry merely a pawn, being manipulated by Meghan for her own purposes? For someone who professes to be a feminist, Meghan's actions appear contradictory, as they seem to demand her husband's constant attention in a manner that some might view as needy or controlling.
Critics argue that Harry is merely playing the part Meghan has scripted for him, akin to a well-trained dog responding to commands. The once vibrant and independent prince seems to have surrendered his identity, conforming to his wife's expectations. Harry's apparent subservience has sparked broader concerns about his well-being. In light of recent news involving Matthew Perry's personal assistant in his tragic demise, the notion of misplaced trust looms large. Harry's situation prompts a chilling question: Can he truly rely on the person closest to him?
As their tour continued, Meghan and Harry visited the Colio Tour, a popular children's school in Bogotá. Harry attempted to win over the audience by counting in Spanish and discussing his children, Archie, 5, and Lilibet, 3. However, a subtle slip in his speech caught attention. "I have young children, and they're not on social media," Harry stated, emphasizing the pronoun "I" rather than "we." This choice of words hints at a potential disconnect or possibly a deeper truth regarding Meghan's role in their children's lives. Harry's efforts to speak Spanish and his reflections on parenting received mixed reactions. Some found his remarks on controlling his children's social media use laughable, considering the challenges of raising children in the digital age. Harry, the father raising his kids in America, seems to be under the illusion that he can shield them from the pervasive influence of social media.
Despite their busy schedule, Meghan and Harry's tour of Colombia continues to raise more questions than it answers. Invited by Vice President Márquez, their agenda includes meetings with leaders and discussions on issues such as cyberbullying. Yet, amid the smiles and handshakes, one cannot help but wonder how much of their tour is genuine and how much is a carefully orchestrated act to maintain their public image. The Colombian tour serves as a stark reminder that, when it comes to Meghan and Harry, appearances can be deceiving.
