A few years ago, the film Horrible Bosses captured the public's attention with its portrayal of cruel and tyrannical employers.
The movie, featuring several A-list actors, struck a chord with many who had faced the challenges of working under difficult superiors. Today, some might argue that this label could be aptly applied to Meghan Markle. Reports have frequently surfaced regarding her alleged mistreatment of staff, leaving many feeling traumatized by her management style, which included 5 a.m. emails and an unyielding work ethic.
While some might suggest that Meghan was simply being proactive, implementing the rigorous work habits she had developed in her previous career, others view her actions as a failed attempt to modernize the British monarchy. Meghan reportedly sought to bring the centuries-old institution into the modern era, even going so far as to propose detailed plans to the late Queen Elizabeth II on how to monetize the monarchy. Given the institution's deep-rooted traditions, one can only speculate on how these ideas were received by the Queen.
The latest revelations come from former employees who worked with Meghan during her brief stint at Spotify, where she and Prince Harry were labeled "grifters" by some. These former staff members have shed light on Meghan's approach to leadership, painting a picture that sharply contrasts with her public image. One former female employee, who wishes to remain anonymous, recounted her experience working under Meghan. Allegedly, when Meghan wants someone to work for her, she engages in a subtle but effective strategy to win them over. It starts with seemingly friendly gestures—emails with book recommendations, casual mentions of shoes spotted in a magazine, and other small tidbits that create a sense of camaraderie. This "sisterhood" approach makes the potential employee feel valued and special, leading them to believe that working for Meghan would be a rewarding experience.
However, according to the source, this honeymoon period doesn't last. Once the individual is fully integrated into Meghan's world, they are treated like the "golden goose," with their ideas and contributions seemingly valued. But soon, cracks begin to appear. Access to Meghan becomes restricted, and what was once an open-door policy turns into a tightly controlled environment. Suddenly, one can no longer walk into a room with an idea; instead, they must wait their turn, be announced, and even then, they might be met with silence.
This account of Meghan's leadership style raises questions about the sincerity of her public persona when she speaks on stage about love, kindness, and humility. Some who have worked with her might find it difficult to reconcile those words with their experiences. According to this well-placed source, Meghan lacks the very qualities she advocates for on a professional level, especially when it comes to dealing with staff.
While these allegations remain unverified and are based on one person's experience, they contribute to the growing narrative of Meghan as a difficult boss. Whether these stories are entirely accurate or not, they certainly add another layer of complexity to the public's perception of the former Duchess of Sussex. As Meghan continues to navigate her life outside the royal family, these stories serve as a reminder that public figures are often subject to intense scrutiny, whether fair or not. The tales of "horrible bosses" like Meghan Markle will undoubtedly continue to captivate and intrigue those who follow her every move.
