Megan Markle took the stage alongside filmmaker Misan Harman and actor David Ooloo after a screening of their short film.
Following this event, Megan shared insights into her four-and-a-half-year-old son Archie's newfound interest in photography, inspired by Harman. She disclosed that she had purchased a camera for Archie to nurture his passion, even though he expressed a desire for a Leica camera, a high-end German brand.
After Megan's revelations, some netizens accused her of fabricating the story to potentially receive a free camera from Leica. Criticisms emerged, labeling her as a "lazy grifter" and suggesting that she left the royal family to exploit titles for perpetual grifting. Others questioned the authenticity of her interest in photography and pointed out a perceived pattern of self-centeredness during events where she played the role of a moderator.
Suspicions intensified as some netizens recounted past instances, such as the request for a bicycle for Archie, and questioned Megan's motives. Some speculated that Megan might attempt to secure a free Leica camera by associating Archie's name with the late Queen. However, reports surfaced that Leica denied any association with Megan, ignoring her in the media.
In the midst of the controversy, comparisons were drawn between Megan's story and Queen Elizabeth II's well-documented passion for photography. The late British monarch had been often photographed with a Leica M3 camera, later switching to a Leica M6. Leica acknowledged Queen Elizabeth II's connection with their cameras, commemorating the gift of an M3 in 1958. Netizens pointed out the stark contrast between the queen's genuine affinity for photography and Megan's perceived attempt to associate herself with Leica for potential financial gain.
The unfolding narrative prompted skepticism about Megan's intentions and underscored the careful consideration that goes into her public statements and associations.
